Lexpert US Guides

2018 Lexpert US Guide

The Lexpert Guides to the Leading US/Canada Cross-Border Corporate and Litigation Lawyers in Canada profiles leading business lawyers and features articles for attorneys and in-house counsel in the US about business law issues in Canada.

Issue link: https://digital.carswellmedia.com/i/991061

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 79 of 87

80 | LEXPERT • June 2018 | www.lexpert.ca/usguide come, pricing is a challenge. Some buyers in industries that would be affected by changes to NAFTA are taking a wait-and- see approach, says Pletcher, who chairs his firm's national mining group. That said, deals are still happening, and equity investors, for the time being, don't seem particularly rattled. Shares in Cana- dian auto parts makers have risen strongly over the past 18 months, with some ap- proaching record highs. Shares in forest companies are also benefitting from an updraft. Practitioners in the area say one of the few areas where uncertainty is show- ing through is in some M&A agreements that now include clauses that require the purchaser to be compensated in the event, say, the US walks away from NAFTA. Perhaps the real issue is that uncertain- ty around trade deal is so great that players simply don't know how, or whether, to act. Over the past year, the Trump adminis- tration has made a variety of statements about its intentions on NAFTA, ranging from, "It's a bad agreement that must be torn up" to, more recently, "Let's renego- tiate the pact." Some observers speculate that even the White House isn't clear on what it wants. One theory making the rounds, ac- cording to a lawyer who asked not to be named, is that the old Canada-US Free Trade Agreement that existed prior to NAFTA was never actually terminat- ed. Instead it was simply left dormant. Should NAFTA be thrown out, this line of thinking goes, the old Free Trade deal would automatically come back into force. And since it was similar to NAF- TA, there would be minimal disruption for Canadian companies. But this just adds to the speculation. The bottom line is that there are a great many ways this issue could be resolved, and given the complexity of NAFTA it- self, each potential outcome would impact companies differently. That's a whole lot to think about for any potential partici- pant in an M&A deal. Some observers wonder if they're simply tuning it out. "I think people are sort of saying, we can only control what we can control," says Goodman's Feldman. "People are doing deals in spite of the uncertainty." There's "an overwhelming feeling from our clients of business as usual right now," Cameron Belsher of McCarthy Tétrault LLP says. NAFTA "is going to be a factor, but right now there are so many other factors lined up for robust M&A ac- tivity [and that's] overweigh- ing NAFTA considerations." Cameron Belsher, McCarthy Tétrault LLP Trade many other factors lined up for robust M&A activity [and that's] overweighing NAFTA considerations." Belsher identifies three of them. One is the low Canadian dollar. Another is interest rates, which are close to historic lows. And the third is the emergence of private-equity funds sitting on vast piles of capital and looking for a place to put it. "The M&A market is as robust as I've seen it since 2006," he says. "We are talking across the board." "From our clients we don't hear a lot of fear about NAFTA," says Belsher. Like everybody else, they're in the dark about how the negotiations will play out, but they're not sitting around waiting for clarity. From their perspective, it's a factor in their thinking, but for the time being it's less important than the immediate drivers of the economy. "People are fo- cused on the availability of capital; there's a lot of liquidity in the market so it's time to build, it's time to grow." Many of the deals he's worked on in- volve businesses started by baby boomers who, as they enter their 60s and 70s, are looking to sell up. They've spent their lives building their companies and now they want to enjoy the benefits. These are strong businesses with good valuations, and private-equity funds are enthusiastic buyers — it's a "perfect storm," he says. Not everybody is feeling euphoric, though. Auto parts manufacturers, for example, would experience significant disruption if NAFTA was torn up, with Canadian players potentially subjected to penalties for their US exports. Lumber producers would be similarly disrupted, as would pulp and paper companies. Those sectors are in the eye of the storm. "What I see is that there is considerable uncertainty associated with industries where there is a very significant compo- nent of trade with the US that's front and centre addressed in NAFTA," says Fred Pletcher, a partner at Borden Ladner Ger- vais LLP. "So, if you're a Canadian auto parts manufacturer or a contributor to the auto supply chain, yeah, it's more difficult these days" to find an acquirer. The stumbling block for a potential buyer is figuring out value for the target as- set. If NAFTA stays in place, that's a rela- tively simple calculation, but if NAFTA goes away or gets renegotiated, what does the price become? Until we know the out-

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Lexpert US Guides - 2018 Lexpert US Guide