Lexpert Special Editions

Special Edition on Infrastructure 2018

The Lexpert Special Editions profiles selected Lexpert-ranked lawyers whose focus is in Corporate, Infrastructure, Energy and Litigation law and relevant practices. It also includes feature articles on legal aspects of Canadian business issues.

Issue link: https://digital.carswellmedia.com/i/1028678

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 16 of 43

WWW.LEXPERT.CA | 2018 | LEXPERT 17 Gillott, Roger J. Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP (416) 862-6818 rgillott@osler.com Mr. Gillott is regularly retained as litigation counsel on the largest infrastruc- ture projects in Canada. He also advises on risk management in construction projects, and tendering and procurement in the public and private sectors. Gilbert, Geoffrey G. Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP (613) 780-3764 geoffrey.gilbert@nortonrosefulbright.com Mr. Gilbert practises in the area of project finance, with an emphasis on public-private partnerships and infrastructure transactions. He regularly advises public authorities, private sector participants and lenders, among others, on large and innovative projects in Canada. He has been particularly active in the LRT space. Gilain, Guy Miller Thomson LLP (514) 879-2132 ggilain@millerthomson.com Specialized in construction law, Mr. Gilain has considerable experience in litigation and in drafting contractual documents. His clientele is composed of owners, developers, general and specialized contractors, and equipment sup- pliers. He also represents national and multinational companies, and various construction industry associations. Gangbar, Leonard A. Bennett Jones LLP (416) 777-7478 gangbarl@bennettjones.com Mr. Gangbar is consistently involved in the development, structuring and financing of complex mixed-use urban projects, and all related multi-party agreements governing their interconnection and use. Gagnon, Nicolas Lavery, de Billy, L.L.P. (514) 877-3046 ngagnon@lavery.ca Mr. Gagnon's practice embraces infrastructure and institutional projects, in- cluding P3s, and focuses on project agreements, negotiations, procurement, default remedy, multi-party litigation and surety-related matters. He advises public and private sector clients, construction professionals, contractors and surety companies at every stage of construction projects. Friend, QC, Anthony L. Bennett Jones LLP (403) 298-3182 frienda@bennettjones.com Mr. Friend's practice areas include commercial and construction litigation and arbitration, assessment and taxation of privately held infrastructure, and corporate arrangements and restructuring. He has acted in over 85 corporate arrangements and restructurings. LEXPERT-RANKED LAWYERS In these transportation Infrastructure projects, there's always a problem of crossing roads and other railways but one of the biggest issues is the crossing of utilities. At the core of any P3 project is a transfer of risk, says Porter. "ere's a long list of things that are risks in the documentation on the legal side and you need to be clear about who's responsible for each risk." e details of these huge projects must be built into the project agreements, which are usually a couple of hundred pages long and include a num- ber of schedules, some more technical than others. ese are largely handled by the engineers and technical people, says Porter, "but it does fall to the lawyers to make sure that those dovetail with the contract so that things work together." Public transit Infrastructure projects are huge, complicated, expensive and take years to plan and implement. "By the time you see holes in the ground and heavy equipment moving around and hoarding up, the work's probably 90% done in terms of the planning and the preparation work and the political work and the agreements," says Porter. All levels of government are involved in decid- ing whether to push forward with a major transit project, which can create a rocky road since it "as- sumes a fairly high level of cooperation between the three levels of government," says Porter. "It's also a pretty fragile model because it means you're only as strong as the weakest link in the chain and if one of the three levels of government decides that they can for whatever reason opt out, then that throws a spanner in the works."

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Lexpert Special Editions - Special Edition on Infrastructure 2018