Lexpert Special Editions

Special Edition on Energy -Nov 2015

The Lexpert Special Editions profiles selected Lexpert-ranked lawyers whose focus is in Corporate, Infrastructure, Energy and Litigation law and relevant practices. It also includes feature articles on legal aspects of Canadian business issues.

Issue link: https://digital.carswellmedia.com/i/583167

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 16 of 51

Farber, Tamara Miller omson LLP (416) 595-8520 tfarber@millerthomson.com Ms. Farber leads the firm's national Environmental Law Group. A Certified Special- ist in Environmental Law, she combines her interest in en- vironmental matters in a civil litigation context as well as in commercial transactions. Ferrara, Justin E. Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP (403) 267-8222 justin.ferrara@nortonroseful- bright.com Mr. Ferrara practises primar- ily in the areas of M&A and corporate finance. He has extensive experience repre- senting both publicly traded and private issuers, including corporations and income funds, in connection with a broad range of matters. Finnerty, Pat C. Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (403) 260-9608 pcf@blakes.com Mr. Finnerty's emphasis is on domestic and cross- border M&A, corporate transactions, public offerings, private placements and special committees. He has extensive experience in the acquisition, structuring and financing of energy projects. Feldberg, Peter D. Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP (403) 261-5364 pfeldberg@fasken.com Mr. Feldberg is the Firm Managing Partner. He acts on all aspects of utility regulation, energy project development and First Nations matters. He acts for applicants before regulatory tribunals and at all court levels. Ferrier, Janet Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP (514) 841-6511 jferrier@dwpv.com Ms. Ferrier's energy practice focuses on domestic and international M&A, joint ventures, investment and related commercial matters. Fitch, QC, Gavin S. McLennan Ross LLP (403) 303-9120 gfitch@mross.com Mr. Fitch focuses on environ- mental, energy regulatory and Aboriginal law, and has extensive experience acting before administrative tribu- nals in approval and permit- ting processes for oil and gas and mining projects and electric power facilities. ABORIGINAL INTERESTS | 17 don't, she cautioned, and title is later recog- nized, lawfully awarded permits could be cancelled, which means projects could even be shut down. In the 14 months or so since it was hand- ed down, Tsilhqot'in has had a discernable impact on First Nations, who have been arriving at the bargaining table with raised expectations, several practitioners agree. "For many Aboriginal communities, there's been a real boost of confidence in terms of their position," says Maxime Faille, an Aboriginal law practitioner at Gowl- ing Lafleur Henderson LLP in Ottawa. "I think it's given a lot of them a little bit more swagger than they had before. "In some cases, it's catapulted groups into a position where they see this as a ma- jor tool, and opportunity for real leverage. ey see the courts are there as a recourse if negotiations don't pan out." at is creating some challenges for proj- ect developers, says Chamberlain. "It can be a bit tricky because you raise people's expectations, they come to the ne- gotiating table, and they may or may not get what they want or think they are entitled to. From my point of view, the thing Tsilhqot'in is doing is it's creating a potentially challeng- ing environment for negotiating at times. ere's a whole pile of stuff simmering." What's simmering are Aboriginal groups who signed away their rights in historic treaties with the federal government 150 years ago. Many are simmering with anger. FAILLE SAYS MANYsuch groups are watching in some dismay as their brethren who never signed treaties or who signed modern-day treaties get far more say over development on their land. "What we're seeing is that people in those communities don't accept they should be second- or even third-class citizens within the wider Aboriginal com- munity in Canada. ey're saying they shouldn't be punished, in effect, or disad- vantaged for having come to terms with Canada 150 years ago when the country was forming and coming together. "So there's a strong sense that they should not be in a significantly worse position than those communities that didn't sign a treaty, or that weren't given that opportunity to enter into a treaty. It's a serious issue." at apparent reversal of fortune, says Chamberlain, "is something I think is not only going to inflame the situation a bit but it's also going to take those raised expecta- tions and it's going to make people say: 'Wait a second. If they've got that, if they've got title and the ability to negotiate that, what should we be able to do here?' "at is a challenge, and it's something that over time is going to have to be re- solved." ere are strong indications the poten- tially explosive issue is headed for the courts. Some First Nations are arguing the his- toric treaties under which they surrendered their land were actually just peace treaties, says Radha Curpen, co-head of the Aborigi- nal law group at Bennett Jones LLP. ese groups say the ancestors who signed the treaties had no concept of private owner- ship of land.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Lexpert Special Editions - Special Edition on Energy -Nov 2015