Lexpert Special Editions

Special Edition on Corporate 2018

The Lexpert Special Editions profiles selected Lexpert-ranked lawyers whose focus is in Corporate, Infrastructure, Energy and Litigation law and relevant practices. It also includes feature articles on legal aspects of Canadian business issues.

Issue link: https://digital.carswellmedia.com/i/971517

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 25 of 39

26 LEXPERT | 2018 | WWW.LEXPERT.CA Meghji, Al Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP (416) 862-5677 ameghji@osler.com Mr. Meghji is widely recognized as one of Canada's leading tax litigators. Counsel to many significant corporate taxpayers. Has successfully argued numerous landmark cases, including the first GAAR case and the first transfer-pricing case in the SCC. McGlaughlin, Grant E. Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP (416) 865-4382 gmcglaughlin@fasken.com Mr. McGlaughlin is a corporate and securities lawyer who focuses on M&A, corporate finance, governance and compliance. He advises investors, boards, special committees, issuers and underwriters. He is a frequent author and speaker on various topics in the areas of corporate finance, mergers & acquisitions and mining. McCullough, Jonathan McCullough O'Connor Irwin LLP (604) 646-3306 jmccullough@moisolicitors.com Mr. McCullough is a founding partner and has been practising corporate and securities law for 30 years. A focus of his practice is private equity transactions, acting on behalf of both fund sponsors and institutional investors in organizing domestic and international private equity funds to invest in buyouts, mezzanine, venture capital, merchant banking, infrastructure and timber assets. May, Neill I. Goodmans LLP (416) 597-4187 nmay@goodmans.ca Mr. May focuses on all aspects of corporate/securities law, with emphasis on M&A, private equity, and public and private financings. He is Co-Chair of Goodmans' Corporate Securities Group and a former member of the TSX Listing Advisory Committee and the OSC's Securities Advisory Committee and Small Business Advisory Committee. Former Adjunct Professor at the University of Toronto, Faculty of Law. Matlow, David J. Goodmans LLP (416) 597-4147 dmatlow@goodmans.ca Mr. Matlow practises corporate finance/securities, private-equity and M&A law. He acts for public and private companies in a range of transactions, including financings, fund formation, initial public offerings, regulatory matters and divestitures. He also acts for a number of private equity firms in their investing activities. He is the Chair of the Jewish Foundation of Greater Toronto. Mathieu, Frank Stikeman Elliott LLP (514) 397-2442 fmathieu@stikeman.com Mr. Mathieu is a partner and member of the Tax Group. He specializes in Canadian income tax law including income tax aspects of mergers & acquisitions, corporate reorganizations and restructurings in a cross-border context, and has extensive expertise in advising foreign private equity funds in relation to their Canadian investments. LEXPERT-RANKED LAWYERS then the SPAC has to wind up and give the mon- ey back to the investors." e first SPACs didn't come to market in Can- ada until 2015, although the TSX had launched them in 2009. "at was just aer the financial crisis, so it was not really a great time to introduce a new financial product like that," says Pincus. It also took the TSX "some time to implement the rules to facilitate SPACs," adds Hong. e inaugural SPAC ended in failure. In April 2015, Dundee Acquisition Corp. completed an IPO by raising $112.3 million and targeted CHC Student Housing Corp. as its qualifying acquisi- tion. But by late January 2015, it announced that it lacked sufficient cash to complete the transaction because an overwhelming number of shareholders opted to redeem their holdings in the SPAC. e redemption option is one of the distinctive features of SPACs and also, says Hong, one of the obstacles to its success. "e first risk is that share- holders must approve the deal," he says. "But the primary challenge that I've seen is that there may not be enough cash at the closing to fund the pur- chase because of the investors' right to redeem and get their cash back." To compensate investors for having their capi- tal held in a trust account for up to two years, a SPAC usually offers shareholders "one share and a warrant or half warrant that's exercisable at a premium," says John Emanoilidis, co-head of the M&A practice at Torys LLP. Shareholders, how- ever, can redeem their investment but retain their warrant, which can further threaten the financial viability of an IPO. To counter that potential problem, another in- novative solution was created in Canada, says Pin- cus. When Canaccord Genuity Acquisition Corp. announced, in July 2017, that it intended to raise $30 million for a SPAC, it "tied [shares and war- rants] together, creating more alignments with the shareholders, who can decide to stay in, in which case they keep their warrant. ey do well if the share price goes up or they can decide to go out, in which case they get their money back with inter- "THE FIRST RISK IS THAT SHAREHOLDERS MUST APPROVE THE DEAL. BUT THE PRIMARY CHALLENGE THAT I'VE SEEN IS THAT THERE MAY NOT BE ENOUGH CASH AT THE CLOSING TO FUND THE PURCHASE BECAUSE OF THE INVESTORS' RIGHT TO REDEEM AND GET THEIR CASH BACK." - PETER HONG; DAVIES WARD PHILLIPS & VINEBERG LLP

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Lexpert Special Editions - Special Edition on Corporate 2018