Lexpert Magazine

May 2018

Lexpert magazine features articles and columns on developments in legal practice management, deals and lawsuits of interest in Canada, the law and business issues of interest to legal professionals and businesses that purchase legal services.

Issue link: https://digital.carswellmedia.com/i/964314

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 55 of 71

56 LEXPERT MAGAZINE | MAY 2018 IN-HOUSE ADVISOR IT TURNS OUT THAT HOURLY RATES AND ALTERNATIVE FEE ARRANGEMENTS ARE NOT MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE. BY JULIUS MELNITZER Alternative…Billable Hours WHEN IT COMES TO ALTERNATIVE FEE arrangements (AFA) and legal project management (LPM) in Canada's legal market, it's hard to rationalize the buzz with the numbers. e buzz is that AFAs and LPM are all the rage, a response to clients' insistence on having more say in how their lawyers arrive at the fees that they charge and how much that fee will be. Common thinking has it that hourly rates are going the way of the dodo. e numbers, however, are a mite confusing. Indeed, a close look at recent statis- tics suggests that billable hours aren't going away anytime soon: they may even be making a comeback. In 2015, Canadian Lawyer's Corporate Counsel Survey found that 12.7 per cent of respondents used AFAs with their primary law firms; in 2016, the number had dropped by over 60 per cent, to 4.9 per cent. And 2017 saw another reduction in the use of AFAs, this time to 3.2 per cent. Meanwhile, resort to billable hours rose slightly, from 46.8 per cent in 2015 to 50.2 per cent in 2016 and 50.5 per cent in 2017. But combinations of billable hours and AFAs also rose, from 42.9 per cent to 44.7 per cent. Perhaps most tellingly, only 6.3 per cent of respondents used AFAs for more than 75 of the legal work they sent to external firms, effectively unchanged from the 5.9 per cent who did so in 2016. For their part, flat fees remained by far the most unpopular means of billing, representing only 1.6 per cent of arrangements, down from 2.0 per cent in 2016. Still, it's not as if the future doesn't continue to hold promise for AFAs: some 78.8 per cent of respondents to the 2016 survey said they were interested in engag- ing with their law firms about AFAs. And almost one-quarter of the 21.2 per cent who weren't interested said they didn't fully understand AFAs. Otherwise, Chica- go-based Patrick Johansen, formerly global director of client value at Reed Smith

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Lexpert Magazine - May 2018