Lexpert Magazine

Jan/Feb 2018

Lexpert magazine features articles and columns on developments in legal practice management, deals and lawsuits of interest in Canada, the law and business issues of interest to legal professionals and businesses that purchase legal services.

Issue link: https://digital.carswellmedia.com/i/933993

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 34 of 75

LEXPERT MAGAZINE | JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2018 35 | TOP 10 DEALS | of Independent Trustees of OneREIT: Torys LLP 8 The Nortel Global Settlement is Top Deal was formerly one of our Top Business Decisions. "I've been involved in the Nortel case since the fall of 2008," says Jay Carfagnini, of Goodmans LLP, which represented the Monitor, Ernst & Young. While Nortel may not have taken quite as long as Jarndyce v. Jarndyce from Dickens' Bleak House, it drew in many law firms, courts, meetings, and multiple jurisdictions — and has taken a very long time indeed. Torys LLP, which acted for Nortel, with a team led by Tony DeMarinis and Scott Bomhof, wrote to Lexpert, "Nortel's multi- jurisdictional business, unprecedented le- gal issues, and eventual big cash stockpile made the restructuring both exceptionally challenging and fascinating, and a case the likes of which may not be seen again for some time." Sticking with our consolidation theme, this time globally, the Nortel case/deal was re-fuelled by an infusion in 2011 that took most observers by surprise. As reported at the time in e Guardian, "e Apple, Microso, Sony and BlackBerry maker Research in Motion are part of a winning consortium of six companies which have bought a valuable tranche of patents from the bankrupt Nortel Networks patent portfolio for $4.5bn (£2.8bn), in a hotly contested auction that saw Google and In- tel lose out." ere was something to settle with, in other words. According to Carfagnini, "e Global Settlement was arguably the most signifi- cant milestone in the case. Given the num- ber of jurisdictions involved and the various creditor and stakeholder interests, a global resolution was the only way the estates were going to be in a position to distribute mon- ey to creditors and pensioners in the various jurisdictions around the world. As you can imagine, the settlement itself was very com- plex, as it had to effectively shut the door on the myriad of issues that had arisen in the context of a multinational business and of its wind-down. In this regard, I would add that the work of retired Delaware Judge Joseph Farnan in mediating and facilitat- ing the settlement at that critical time in the case was also important." D.J. Miller, a partner at ornton Grout Finnigan LLP offers this explanation for why the decision made the deal: "e Global Settlement in Nortel announced on October 12, 2016, became somewhat inevitable aer the Ontario Court of Ap- peal (OCA) issued 42-page written Rea- sons on May 3, 2016, dismissing an appli- cation by the bondholders and US debtor estate for leave to appeal the pro rata alloca- tion decisions issued by the Canadian and US Courts. e very strong OCA decision led to the first level appeal court in Dela- ware, which had already heard the appeal but hadn't issued a decision, referring the matter directly to the highest appeal court in Delaware for determination. Had a US Appeal Court reached a different conclu- sion than the OCA, it would have le the parties in limbo with no means to allocate the $7.3 billion in global proceeds and fur- ther costs being incurred, since any alloca- tion required a consistent decision of the Canadian and US Courts. is would have been an 'Armageddon' scenario for credi- tors, who had already waited seven years with no distribution. "e highest appeal court in Delaware had previously issued a harsh criticism over the costs incurred in the Nortel proceeding and the resulting impact on pensioners and other creditors. It therefore seemed unlikely that the same Court would overturn the un- derlying decision and go in a different direc- tion than the OCA (which had already up- held the underling decision), as that would have sent the parties back to square one. At its simplest, once everyone came to that re- alization, it was just a matter of how much money would have to be transferred to bring it to an end. e contributors to, and beneficiaries of, the transfer of money fol- lowing the allocation decisions were known from the outset, and never changed." Key Law Firms Nortel Canada: Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP Nortel Networks Inc.: Norton Rose Ful- bright Canada LLP (Corporate/M&A, Restructuring, IP, Litigation); Torys LLP (Restructuring, Litigation) Informal Nortel Noteholder Group: Bennett Jones LLP US Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors: Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP (Restructuring ) UK Pension Protection Fund and Nortel Networks UK Pension Trust Ltd.: ornton Grout Finnigan LLP (Restructuring, Liti- gation); Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Restructuring, Litigation) Wilmington Trust, National Association: Dentons Canada LLP (Canadian Counsel) Monitor, Ernst & Young: Goodmans LLP Joint Administrators of Nortel Networks UK Ltd.: Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP; Lax O'Sullivan Lisus Gottlieb LLP Former Directors and Officers of Nortel Canada: Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP Former employees and LTD beneficiaries of Nortel Canada: Koskie Minsky LLP Ontario Superintendent of Financial Services: Paliare Roland Rosenberg Rothstein LLP Morneau Shepell Ltd.: McCarthy Tétrault LLP Nortel's continuing Canadian employees: Nelligan O'Brien Payne LLP; Shibley Righton LLP 9 Stelco Restructuring Another perennial favourite on Lexpert lists is the restructuring of Stelco Inc.. It had been operating under the protection of the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) since being granted an initial stay of proceedings in September of 2014. On June 9, 2017, the court approved its re- structuring under the CCAA. On June 30, Bedrock Industries Group LLC announced that all of the closing conditions regarding its announced transaction had been satis- fied and its acquisition of Stelco was closed. Bedrock plans to continue steel opera- tions, and approximately 2,200 existing jobs would continue at Stelco's Hamilton and Lake Erie facilities. e Restructuring plan also has the necessary support from Stelco creditors, including the province, and Stel-

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Lexpert Magazine - Jan/Feb 2018