Lexpert Special Editions

Special Edition on Litigation 2017

The Lexpert Special Editions profiles selected Lexpert-ranked lawyers whose focus is in Corporate, Infrastructure, Energy and Litigation law and relevant practices. It also includes feature articles on legal aspects of Canadian business issues.

Issue link: https://digital.carswellmedia.com/i/896623

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 39 of 43

40 LEXPERT | 2017 | WWW.LEXPERT.CA Zalmanowitz, QC, Barry Dentons Canada LLP (780) 423-7344 barry.zalmanowitz@dentons.com Mr. Zalmanowitz's competition and antitrust practice includes representing clients in criminal and non-criminal investigations and cases under the Competition Act, and advocacy in appellate courts. He also represents clients in compliance with the Investment Canada Act and establishes competition and antitrust compliance programs and policies. Zakaib, Glenn M. Borden Ladner Gervais LLP (416) 367-6664 gzakaib@blg.com Mr. Zakaib's practice focuses on product liability (drug and medical devices, automotive and aviation products, industrial/electrical equipment and home appliances) and class proceedings (product liability, life insurance and Competition Act claims). Woods, AdE, James A. Woods LLP (514) 982-4503 jwoods@woods.qc.ca Senior partner with nearly 40 years of experience in the fields of litigation and arbitration. Considered to be one of the best lawyers in Québec and Canada, he has pleaded before all federal, Québec and Ontario provincial tribunals, and the SCC. During his career, he has also acted as an arbitrator, either as president or as a member of a panel, both ad hoc and under the rules of the ICC. Wilson, Christopher S. Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP (604) 641-4841 chris.wilson@nortonrosefulbright.com Mr. Wilson is a prominent Canadian intellectual property litigator. He has led several precedent-setting trademark and trade secrets (breach of confidence) actions, and regularly acts in copyright, patent, design and other IP matters at trial and on appeal. His practice encompasses a wide range of industries, ranging from retail and consumer products to electronics, IT and manufacturing. Williams, Matthew G. Thorsteinssons LLP (416) 864-9104 mgwilliams@thor.ca Mr. Williams's practice focuses on all aspects of taxpayer representation. He has appeared before the Tax Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Appeal, the Ontario Superior Court and the Supreme Court of Canada on a wide range of issues including tax appeals, tax evasion matters, CPP/EI appeals, Charter applications and rectification orders. Williams, David B. Harrison Pensa LLP (519) 661-6782 dwilliams@harrisonpensa.com Mr. Williams is considered to be one of Ontario's most respected civil litigators. A specialist in civil litigation, his practice is focused on personal injury, medical malpractice, class action and complex commercial litigation matters. Inducted into the American College of Trial Lawyers, his career has brought him before the Trial Division, the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Canada. LEXPERT-RANKED LAWYERS Tom Cumming of Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP. Bennett Jones LLP acted for Orphan Well As- sociation with a team that included Kenneth Lenz, QC, and Michael Selnes. Alberta Energ y Regulator was represented internally by Patricia Johnston, QC, and Keely Cameron. Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP acted for Alberta Treasury Branches with a team that included Ryan Zahara and Chris Nyberg. e Minister of Justice and Solicitor General of Alberta was represented internally by Lillian Riczu, Lisa Semenchuk and Vivienne Ball. e Attorney General of Canada was represented internally by Bruce Hughson. Lawson Lundell LLP represented the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers with a team that included Lewis Manning. McMillan LLP represented the Canadian Asso- ciation of Insolvency and Restructuring Profession- als with a team that included Caireen Hanert and Adam Maerov. e Attorney General for Saskatchewan was represented internally by R. J. Fyfe. British Columbia (Natural Gas Development) and the British Columbia Oil and Gas Commission was represented internally by A. Welch. ASTRAZENECA CANADA V. MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS DECISION DATE: FEBRUARY 7, 2017 Mylan Pharmaceuticals ULC has invalidated the Canadian formulation patent relating to the drug VIMOVO®. In its decision in AstraZeneca Can- ada Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals ULC, 2017 FC 142, the Federal Court of Canada found the claims of Canadian Patent No. 2,449,098 (the "098 Patent") invalid for obviousness. is de- cision paves the way for a generic version of the drug in Canada. VIMOVO® is a drug currently sold in Canada by AstraZeneca, under a licence to the 098 Pat- ent from Pozen (collectively, "Astra"). e drug contains naproxen (a popular non-steroidal anti- inflammatory drug, or NSAID) and esomeprazole (a proton pump inhibitor, or PPI, which protects the stomach). In VIMOVO®, the esomeprazole is formulated to release in the body before the naprox- en. e 098 Patent is directed to this sequential- release formulation architecture. Mylan alleged that the 098 Patent was obvious, for it merely applied a well-known formulation architecture to a well-known NSAID-PPI com- bination, using routine means, to achieve the well- known advantage of reducing gastrointestinal side effects in patients receiving NSAID co-therapy. As- tra argued that the prior art taught away from for- mulating a PPI in this manner, without an enteric coat, rendering the invention non-obvious.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Lexpert Special Editions - Special Edition on Litigation 2017