Lexpert Special Editions

Special Edition on Litigation 2017

The Lexpert Special Editions profiles selected Lexpert-ranked lawyers whose focus is in Corporate, Infrastructure, Energy and Litigation law and relevant practices. It also includes feature articles on legal aspects of Canadian business issues.

Issue link: https://digital.carswellmedia.com/i/896623

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 14 of 43

WWW.LEXPERT.CA | 2017 | LEXPERT 15 Desrosiers, Julie Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP (514) 397-7516 jdesrosiers@fasken.com Ms. Desrosiers is the leader of the Global Technology & Intellectual Property group. She acts for high technology businesses in connection with injunctions, seizures and procedures seeking to protect elements of their intellectual property or their trade secrets and strategic information. Her practice is primarily IP litigation, primarily in patent litigation regarding pharmaceutical patents. Deane, Robert J.C. Borden Ladner Gervais LLP (604) 640-4250 rdeane@blg.com Mr. Deane is the leader of BLG's International Trade and Arbitration Group and co-leader of the Privacy and Data Protection Group. His practice specializes in international and domestic commercial arbitration, commercial litigation, privacy law, intellectual property litigation and advertising/ competition law. He is counsel in arbitration proceedings throughout North America, Asia and Europe. Dalphond, Pierre J. Stikeman Elliott LLP (514) 397-3219 pdalphond@stikeman.com Senior counsel in the Litigation Group. Former senior judge of the Québec Court of Appeal, he provides strategic advice and acts as mediator and arbitrator. Visiting Professor at Université de Montréal, Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (London), member of the Court of Arbitration for Sport, Member Arbitrator at Arbitration Place (Toronto) and on the roster of ICC/ICDR Canada/AAA. D'Silva, Alan L.W. Stikeman Elliott LLP (416) 869-5204 adsilva@stikeman.com Mr. D'Silva is a leading litigation lawyer in Canada with expertise in a number of areas of law including defence of class actions, corporate/commercial disputes, securities litigation, insurance litigation, professional negligence, sports law and directors' and officers' claims. He has acted as counsel in more than 200 publicly reported cases and has extensive experience at all levels of court. Curry, Tom Lenczner Slaght Royce Smith Griffin LLP (416) 865-3096 tcurry@litigate.com Recognized nationally as a leading trial and appellate counsel, Mr. Curry has a long record of success in high-profile commercial litigation, class actions, arbitrations, business disputes, administrative law, judicial review, intellectual property and professional liability cases. He is a Fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers and the International Academy of Trial Lawyers. Creber, Anthony (Tony) Gowling WLG (613) 786-0140 anthony.creber@gowlingwlg.com Mr. Creber is a leading IP litigator who focuses on chemical, biological and pharmaceutical patents. He appears regularly before the Federal Courts and the SCC including the leading decision on novelty and obviousness (Plavix). LEXPERT-RANKED LAWYERS sits on the firm's board of directors. She praises the decision for being fair to the parties. "What we see from this decision is a willingness of the court to find the best approach for a just and equitable decision in the circumstances of the case," she says. Another aspect critics focused on was the fact that Google is a third party that has not been accused of wrongdoing, and yet it is the subject of the injunction. But according to Ferron, that's not a problem because it's not uncommon for courts to order third parties such as ISPs to identify an account owner or for companies like PayPal to reveal the identity of a customer, says Ferron. "In this case, Google did not dispute that Equustek was suffering serious harm, and it was not a great inconvenience for Google to fix the problem," she says. Google has now taken the case south of the border to the US District Court for Northern California in a bid to test the validity of the Supreme Court of Canada ruling. It is arguing that the Canadian court has overstepped its jurisdiction and its order to de-index Datalink websites globally goes against US protections of freedom of speech. One of the unusual aspects of the case was the determination of the perpetrator. Datalink had originally been a reseller of Equustek products but later began producing counterfeit versions sold under its own name. First, Equustek tried to use the courts to force Datalink to desist, but

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Lexpert Special Editions - Special Edition on Litigation 2017