Lexpert Special Editions

Special Edition on Energy 2017

The Lexpert Special Editions profiles selected Lexpert-ranked lawyers whose focus is in Corporate, Infrastructure, Energy and Litigation law and relevant practices. It also includes feature articles on legal aspects of Canadian business issues.

Issue link: https://digital.carswellmedia.com/i/888237

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 13 of 39

14 LEXPERT | 2017 | WWW.LEXPERT.CA Drance, Jonathan S. Stikeman Elliott LLP (604) 631-1361 jdrance@stikeman.com Mr. Drance specializes in project development and financing with a focus on M&A, capital markets and infrastructure. He has acted for Canfor, Bentall, Terasen, Duke Energy and more. He has also served on the Board of BC Hydro and at various times, as Chair of the Corporate Governance Committee and its Capital Projects Committee. He writes extensively on corporate governance and fiduciary duties. Donald, Danna Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP (416) 862-4214 ddonald@osler.com Ms. Donald's practice focuses on project finance, including social and transportation infrastructure, renewable energy, public-private partnerships, and syndicated and acquisition loan facilities. She has led Osler's commercial team in providing advisory services on many infrastructure and energy transactions including the debt and equity financing of some of Canada's largest wind and solar projects Desbarats, QC, Robert P. Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP (403) 260-7015 rdesbarats@osler.com Mr. Desbarats is a corporate and commercial lawyer whose practice primarily involves commercial transactions relating to all aspects of the Canadian and international upstream and midstream oil and gas, oil sands and liquefied natural gas businesses, including acquisitions and divestitures, joint ventures, power, upstream and midstream oilfield activities and marketing arrangements. Dépelteau, Jean-Pierre Dentons Canada LLP (514) 878-8814 j-p.depelteau@dentons.com Mr. Dépelteau is a member of the Construction and Infrastructure group of Dentons Canada LLP's Montréal office, with over 40 years of experience in the construction industry. He provides legal and strategic advice to a variety of public, semi-public and private-sector owners, as well as construction contractors, specialized construction companies and equipment suppliers. Denstedt, QC, Shawn H.T. Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP (403) 260-7088 sdenstedt@osler.com Mr. Denstedt practises environmental, regulatory and Aboriginal law in the energy, mining and natural resources areas. He appears regularly before provincial and federal tribunals. DeMarco, Lisa (Elisabeth) DeMarco Allan LLP (647) 991-1190 lisa@demarcoallan.com Ms. DeMarco is a world-leading energy and climate change lawyer. She represents governments, banks, multinational energy companies and industry associations on regulatory, policy, storage, renewables, pipeline, First Nations and related matters. She regularly appears before regulators including the National Energy Board and Ontario Energy Board, and has addressed the UNFCCC plenary. LEXPERT-RANKED LAWYERS to be a re-thinking of the licensee management scheme that the AER uses. "e only way the existing scheme works, when comparing deemed assets to deemed li- abilities, is on the assumption that those deemed liabili- ties will not become detached from those deemed assets at the most critical juncture, upon an insolvency." According to Antonopoulos, the only other way the situation can be addressed from a government stand- point, in his view, is for the federal government to enact amendments to the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act — amendments that ensure that the "polluter pay" prin- ciple is enshrined in a way that assures it is given a super- priority status over the claims of secured creditors. Osler's Buckingham adds, "Parliamentary resolution of the purported conflict is appropriate if the court de- clines to grant leave or determines not to reframe the issues to permit parallel application of federal and pro- vincial laws that preserves the application of the 'pol- luter pays' principle." In addition, says Melanie Gaston, also an Osler part- ner in Calgary, if Parliament does not correct legisla- tively, it seems contrary to the general policy underlying the environmental framework in Canada and would undermine efforts to have licensees deal responsibly with environmental obligations by prioritizing credi- tors' rights. "It would be more consistent to have creditor pres- sure on debtor licensees to deal with environmental obligations than what this decision suggests," Gaston explains. "A policy conflict arises where it is contrary to the interest of creditors for debtors to meet their envi- ronmental obligations." Still, says Antonopoulos, the fact of the matter is that the Alberta Energy Regulator, with this decision in hand, having lost in the appeal courts, is not going to sit on the sidelines. In his view, it can be anticipated that the AER "won't just allow this operational con- flict to continue to exist such that the province and the public of Alberta would continue to be at risk for these abandonment obligations — through tactics taken by trustees in bankruptcy to renounce valueless properties or properties that have a negative asset value because of the environmental liabilities, so that they can sell off the assets that are still valuable." Where the owner of the assets is not in a strong financial position, secured lenders and potential asset acquirers may be better served to await the bankruptcy … [and] 'cherry-pick' the better assets without the financial detriment of the less desirable assets …" - Christopher Nixon, Stikeman Elliott LLP "

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Lexpert Special Editions - Special Edition on Energy 2017