La Cible

Mai 2017

La Cible, magazine officiel de l’IQPF, est destinée aux planificateurs financiers et leur permet d’obtenir des unités de formation continue (UFC). Chaque numéro aborde une étude de cas touchant les différents domaines de la planification financière.

Issue link: https://digital.carswellmedia.com/i/855790

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 21 of 23

22 lacible | Mai 2017 FEATURE ARTICLE Tax and social measures Many tax measures, especially for families, are calculated as a percentage of net income, which is found on line 236 of the federal tax return and line 275 of the Québec tax return. If this net income declines, the amount received for many tax measures increases. Let's look at a couple with two children and a family income of $52,000, earned in a proportion of 60%- 40%, that decides to contribute $1,000 in an RRSP. Reducing taxable income by contributing $1,000 to an RRSP adds $135 to their Canada Child Tax Benefit, $40 to their Child Assistance Payment and $50 to their GST credit. That puts a tax-free $225 in the family's pocket, upping their marginal rate by 22.5%. Before going any further with the analysis, is it beneficial to have an RRSP with an adjusted MTR of 59.62% (22.5% + marginal tax rate for a family with an income of $52,000, that is, 37.12%)? For most families on a tight budget, contributing to an RRSP in this situation would be a good idea. Another possible benefit: the amount received for measures such as the tax credit for medical expenses might be increased. Effective marginal tax rate In 1999, UQAM professor Claude Laferrière decided to publish tables illustrating the effective marginal tax rate (EMTR), which takes all available tax measures into account. Every year, his tables are updated on the Centre québécois de formation en fiscalité (CQFF) 3 website. This indispensable financial planning tool vividly shows the effect of EMTR and clarifies the short- term impact of an RRSP contribution. This is important for people to understand when they are trying to build wealth and a retirement nest egg. There are probably thousands of different situations. The idea is not to find someone's exact EMTR but to make people aware of the benefits of contributing to an RRSP and, above all, the real impact. TAX INEQUITIES AND RRSPs Still today, the connections between investments and taxation are not fully understood by most people. And yet these two areas are completely entwined, especially when it comes to assessing the real impact of an RRSP contribution. A s yo u k n ow, t h e C a n a d i a n t a x syste m i s progressive, calculated as a percentage of taxable income. In 2017, the maximum marginal tax rate (MTR) of 53.3% applies to taxable incomes over $200,000, and it declines progressively to 0% for an income of $11,474. Since 73.1% of Québecers earn under $50,000, 1 you might think that most of them have a marginal tax rate of 37.12% or less (which is the rate for the brackets between $45,282 and $84,779). 2 The tax system and its impact on RRSPs If we limit our analysis to this first level, we can conclude that for a taxpayer with a taxable income of $50,000, an RRSP investment is to their disadvantage, since their marginal tax rate is 37.12%. If we compare this taxpayer's situation with their neighbour's, whose MTR is 53.3%, we have to admit it's not fair. Some people even claim it is better for low-income households to invest in a TFSA, since the deduction is "not worth it." A quick Google search shows that lots of media, bloggers and seemingly legitimate "experts" explain that if your MTR is low, it is not to your benefit to contribute to an RRSP. But let's take our analysis a little further. André Lacasse F.Pl., MBA Director of business development Centre financier SFL de la Montérégie 1 See online at . 2 See online at . 3 See online at .

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of La Cible - Mai 2017