Lexpert Magazine

July/August 2017

Lexpert magazine features articles and columns on developments in legal practice management, deals and lawsuits of interest in Canada, the law and business issues of interest to legal professionals and businesses that purchase legal services.

Issue link: https://digital.carswellmedia.com/i/854329

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 39 of 71

40 LEXPERT MAGAZINE | JULY/AUGUST 2017 FEATURE HOW FAR CAN bureaucrats go in refusing to follow decisions of ad- ministrative tribunals? at was the question raised by an importing compa- ny in Canada v. Bri-Chem Supply (2016 FCA 257). e court's answer seems intuitive: not very far. But if not for an anonymous source who, in the late stages of litigation, provided Peter Kirby of Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP, lead counsel for the importers, with an envelope of critical documents, the bureaucrats and administrators at the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) might still be getting away with disregarding the directions of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (CITT), the statutory body that oversees the agency. Kirby had earlier been counsel for the importer in Frito-Lay Canada v. Canada Border Services Agency (CA CITT), a 2012 ruling in which the CITT upheld the ability of importers to correct erroneous customs declarations in order to obtain more favourable tariff treatment. e CBSA appealed, but eventually discontinued the appeal. Still, the agency steadfastly refused to apply Frito-Lay when identical is- sues arose with regard to goods imported by Bri-Chem, Ever Green Ecologi- cal Services and Southern Pacific Resource Corp. (SPR), the three companies whose consolidated cases make up the Bri-Chem trilogy. is despite the fact that, as the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) later noted, the CITT ruling in Frito-Lay was directly on point and rationally indistinguishable from the facts in the trilogy — so much so that the FCA felt compelled to uphold the CITT's conclusion that CBSA's conduct amounted to an abuse of process. Perhaps all of this is not surprising. Bureaucrats are answerable to politicians — as well as to the rule of law. is includes attempting to antici- pate political considerations in view of the Canadian-US relationship. Indeed, sources have it that one reason the CBSA took the stand it did in Bri-Chem was because the United States, Canada's NAFTA partner, was concerned that RIDE' THE 'ADMINISTRATIVE LAST STOP ON IN THE BRI-CHEM TRILOGY, A TRIBUNAL FOUND THAT THE CANADA BORDER SERVICES AGENCY WAS DISREGARDING REGULATION. CHALLENGING THE AGENCY PROVED AN UPHILL, BUT ULTIMATELY WORTHWHILE, BATTLE BY JULIUS MELNITZER PHOTO: REUTERS

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Lexpert Magazine - July/August 2017