Lexpert Magazine

June 2017

Lexpert magazine features articles and columns on developments in legal practice management, deals and lawsuits of interest in Canada, the law and business issues of interest to legal professionals and businesses that purchase legal services.

Issue link: https://digital.carswellmedia.com/i/834783

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 59 of 75

60 LEXPERT MAGAZINE | JUNE 2017 IN-HOUSE ADVISOR Arbitration has become the default for corporations seeking international dispute resolution. In-house counsel, however, should keep in mind some of the peculiarities involved BY SHELDON GORDON New Rules in Neutral Territory IN JANUARY, Tokyo Electric Power Co. (Tepco) cancelled a long-term uranium supply contract with Saskatoon-based Cameco Corp. on one day's notice. Cameco said that there was no basis for the cancellation and that Tepco was in default. Under terms of the contract, the two parties entered a 90-day, good-faith negotiation period, to be followed by binding arbitration, if necessary. Canadian corporations are increasingly using cross-border commercial arbitration as a way of re- solving disputes without civil litigation. is trend is likely to continue as Canada tries to diversify its commercial relationships and depend less heavily on the US market. For in-house counsel, it raises the question of whether arbitration should be their company's de- fault option in the event of a cross-border dispute. And if so, what arbitral conditions should be included in their contracts? Records kept by one international arbitration body, the International Centre for Dispute Resolu- tion (ICDR), show that it administered 126 arbitration cases involving at least one Canadian com- pany in 2016, up from 104 the previous year. Data from the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) show the number of Canadian firms participating in ICC-administered arbitration climbed to 57 in 2016, a record high and up from 35 in 2015. "Canada and to a certain extent the US are a bit behind the curve on international commercial arbitration compared to Europe," says Craig Chiasson, a partner at Borden Ladner Gervais LLP in Vancouver. "One of the big issues that draws people to international arbitration is whether the con- tracting parties are willing to trust the jurisdiction of one party's courts or the other's. Canadians and Americans historically have been fairly comfortable in each other's courts." PHOTO: SHUTTERSTOCK

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Lexpert Magazine - June 2017