Lexpert US Guides

Corporate 2017

The Lexpert Guides to the Leading US/Canada Cross-Border Corporate and Litigation Lawyers in Canada profiles leading business lawyers and features articles for attorneys and in-house counsel in the US about business law issues in Canada.

Issue link: https://digital.carswellmedia.com/i/829785

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 11 of 63

12 | LEXPERT • June 2017 | www.lexpert.ca/usguide-corporate/ FRANCHISORS in the US might reason- ably assume that, because of the proximity of Canada and the similarities in our culture, less research is needed than if they were moving to a faraway country. Forgoing the same level of research may be especially tempting for the franchisors that have invested a signifi- cant amount of money into US disclosure documents and processes, "but they can't," says Ned Levitt of Dickinson Wright LLP in Toronto. "Just because we are so much alike doesn't mean we're dealing with the same issues." For starters, Canada's 10 provinces and territories present variations in governing legislation and regulation. Six provinces — BC, Alberta, Manitoba, Ontario, Prince Edward Island and New Bruns- wick — each have their own franchise-specific statutes. And so simply resorting to the "wraparound" business and disclosure model that is prevalent in the United States is a dangerous proposition, Levitt says. "We recommend they do proper Canadian disclosure from square one — one that complies with all provinces — if there is an issue around compliance, and it's an early issue that in-house counsel re- ally wants to understand because they're going to have to make some decisions about how to proceed." US in-house counsel, even when they hire Canadian law firms to do the Canadian work, really have to adjust, he says. For example, in both the US and Canada, where they have to put the cost of estab- lishing a franchise in the disclosure agreement, "I can't tell you the number of times I get a US fran- chiser coming into Canada with numbers that are perfectly valid in the US but not valid in Canada." The cost of square footage and labor in Minneapolis may be nothing like the cost in Montréal and, if they just use the US number, warns Levitt, "they will have [inadvertently] provided a defective dis- closure document that will at least give the franchisee a remedy of a 60-day rescission and possibly as much as two years and possibly damages as well." FRANCHISE LAW PHOTO: SHUTTERSTOCK Cross-border FRANCHISING US franchisors moving into Canada face challenges, including language, disclosure and provincial statutes, as well as a recent court decision expanding the interpretation of what it means to be a 'party' to a franchise agreement BY SANDRA RUBIN

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Lexpert US Guides - Corporate 2017