Lexpert Magazine

Jan/Feb 2017

Lexpert magazine features articles and columns on developments in legal practice management, deals and lawsuits of interest in Canada, the law and business issues of interest to legal professionals and businesses that purchase legal services.

Issue link: https://digital.carswellmedia.com/i/780150

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 35 of 71

36 LEXPERT MAGAZINE | JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2017 FEATURE AFTER THE DISAPPOINTING jurisprudential results experienced by Canadian business in 2015, the landscape more than evened out this past year — which is not to say that Canadian appellate courts ignored anti-business arguments: while five of our top 10 business decisions can be regarded as decidedly pro-business, four do not favour the business community, and one decision can be regarded as mixed. e decision that topped the list, CIBC v. Green, significantly raised the bar for leave to appeal applica- tions in secondary-market securities class actions, and is huge in its impact. Our second choice, Ledcor Construction v. Northbridge Indemnity Insurance, was regarded in many quarters as even more impactful than Green, albeit for its negative impact on business. e decision creates greater exposure to liability for businesses that use standard-form contracts, especially in the insurance and construction industries. Still, it's the only one in the top five that doesn't favour business. e next three — Canada v. Chambre des notaires du Québec; Endean v. BC; and Nortel Networks Corp. (Re) — were all welcomed by the business community: Chambre des notaires enshrined the constitutional protection our courts afford to solicitor-client privilege; Endean will allow judges and parties much greater flexibility in dealing with national class actions, something that should decidedly impact their efficiency and cost; and Nortel provides a procedural and technological framework for the management of multi- jurisdictional insolvencies. From that point on, however, it's downhill for business: only McGillivray Restaurant v. Canada, which provides a higher level of certainty and comfort to taxpayers and advisors seeking guidance on the im- portant and pervasive issue of "de facto control" over a corporation for tax purposes, can be regarded as pro-business among the remaining five cases. For its part, Keough v. Sandfire Capital produced a mixed result: although it created greater certainty for New Brunswick mortgagees in the event of default, it also broadened their potential liability. 10 Top OF 2016 Business Decisions LAST YEAR'S TOP DECISIONS REFLECT THE CONTINUATION OF A BALANCED APPROACH TO BUSINESS. COURTS DID, HOWEVER, BREAK GROUND WHEN IT CAME TO JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES AND CLASS ACTIONS BY JULIUS MELNITZER PHOTO: SHUTTERSTOCK

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Lexpert Magazine - Jan/Feb 2017