Lexpert Magazine

Jan/Feb 2017

Lexpert magazine features articles and columns on developments in legal practice management, deals and lawsuits of interest in Canada, the law and business issues of interest to legal professionals and businesses that purchase legal services.

Issue link: https://digital.carswellmedia.com/i/780150

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 33 of 71

34 LEXPERT MAGAZINE | JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2017 ada's pharmaceutical supply chain. It also expands McKesson's presence in the retail pharmacy space with the addition of ap- proximately 470 Rexall and Rexall Pharma Plus corporate-owned stores to its existing pharmacy banner business." PATRICIA OLASKER DAVIES WARD PHILLIPS & VINEBERG LLP The transaction represents a significant strategic acquisition by McKesson in the Canadian market. The acquisition reflects McKesson's view that Canada's health-care landscape is rapidly changing, marked by a move of primary care into pharmacies." " Key Legal Players Sprott Assett Management advisors: Arthur Einav (in-house); Stikeman Elliott LLP (M&A); Paul, Weiss, Riind, Wharton & Garrison LLP (US matters) Central GoldTrust advisor: Dentons Canada LLP (M&A, securities) Counsel to the Central GoldTrust's special board committee: Bennett Jones LLP (litigation) Purpose Investments advisor: Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP 9 McKesson's Acquisition of Rexall US-based health-care-services provider McKesson Corp., which already has a pharmaceutical footprint in Canada, has acquired Canada's Rexall pharmacy chain (and related companies) in a $3-billion deal. McKesson, headquartered in San Francisco, currently owns smaller drug- stores in Canada and supplies drugs to Rexall and other pharmacies. e inten- tion was to acquire 470 Rexall stores. is will add weight to Rexall as it competes with Shoppers Drug Mart, now owned by Loblaw Cos. Ltd. Rexall was externally represented by Dentons Canada LLP, with a team led by Shawna Vogel. Patricia Olasker, leading the Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP team for McKesson, says: "e transaction repre- sents a significant strategic acquisition by McKesson in the Canadian market. e acquisition reflects McKesson's view that Canada's health-care landscape is rapidly changing, marked by a move of primary care into pharmacies. McKesson Corp. has operated in Canada for about 100 years, both through McKesson Canada, which operates a network of independent pharmacies in Canada, and also directly as a supplier of medicines, supplies and information technologies to pharma- cies, manufacturers, hospitals and other health-care institutions. is acquisition strengthens McKesson's position in Can- In December, the transaction reached another milestone when the Competition Bureau signed off, pending the divestiture of 28 drugstores across Canada. Key Legal Players McKesson advisors: Jennifer Zerczy (in-house); Davies Ward Phillips Vineberg LLP (M&A, antitrust, tax, pension/employment, real estate, environmental, regulatory, IP, litigation) Rexall advisors: Dentons Canada LLP (M&A); Bennett Jones LLP (competition) 10 Alimentation Couche-Tard's Bid for CST Brands Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. has had a history of expanding through acquisition. Sébastien ériault of Davies Ward Phil- lips & Vineberg LLP, Couche-Tard's exter- nal counsel, proudly described the compa- ny's expansions to date in North America and Europe. | TOP DEALS | Lexpert's Top 10 Deals list, published annually since January 2004, is unique and distinct from league tables prepared by accountants, invest- ment banks and financial analysts, which are ranked, for the most part, by size of the transaction. This list, rather, is based on an extensive canvass conducted in October and November 2016 by Lexpert of Canadian M&A, securities and corporate finance lawyers. There were several criteria this year, including the fact that the deal had to be announced between Nov. 1, 2015 and Nov. 1, 2016. However, this year we expanded our position on the closing date. While we preferred deals set to close in 2016 or early 2017, we were not as strict on that clos- ing. We particularly invite your comments on this decision. For the article itself, we interviewed Canadian lawyers. However, we have attempted to note the non-Canadian law firms on these deals, which were considerable in number. Should this change in future editions? Most importantly, the deal must stand for more than itself: represent a trend, illustrate some aspect of the year's economic climate or be a portent of things to come. There is no minimum size or preferred structure — this list's definition of "deal" is anything Canadian lawyers worked on that they considered to be significant. TOP 10 DEALS SELECTION PROCESS

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Lexpert Magazine - Jan/Feb 2017