Lexpert Magazine

Jan/Feb 2017

Lexpert magazine features articles and columns on developments in legal practice management, deals and lawsuits of interest in Canada, the law and business issues of interest to legal professionals and businesses that purchase legal services.

Issue link: https://digital.carswellmedia.com/i/780150

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 10 of 71

LEXPERT MAGAZINE | JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2017 11 INFRASTRUCTURE IS A PERENNIAL focus of the Canadian Council for Public-Private Partnerships' yearly conference, and No- vember's meeting in Toronto heard from lawyers on procurement and P3 law, and from Canada's consul general in Detroit on joint Canadian-American projects. Vendor Performance Program Infrastructure Ontario (IO) announced that it will launch a new vendor perfor- mance program for construction contrac- tors in 2017. e program will impose a scorecard on any contractor to the Ontario government, and infractions would result in penalties that could affect a vendor's ability to win future procurements. During the conference breakout session, "Let's Get Jurisprudential: Hot Topics in P3 Law and Procurement," IO's General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, Marni Dicker, described the new program. "We have created this program out of a real need: to appreciate and understand … the good performers." e greatest risks to a project are during a construction phase, she said, and so the new program applies only to construction contractors. e AFP Vendor Performance Program, as it's called, was expected (at time of writ- ing) to have launched in January 2017 and be fully phased in by January 2018. e approach to vendor performance has been informed by due diligence within IO and dialogue with industry members. e pro- gram will be reviewed no later than fall 2018 in order to assess lessons learned dur- ing the first 18 months of implementation. is program will measure vendor per- formance based on a clearly laid out set of criteria, and will introduce a scorecard for construction contractors who participate in Infrastructure Ontario projects. Con- struction contractors will be given a per- formance score, similar to a report card, whereby the contractor's performance on alternative financing and procurement (AFP) projects over the past 24 months will be assessed against specific AFP con- tract requirements. Construction compa- nies will be informed about their actual past performance results to help them bet- ter understand the consequences for future projects, and will be encouraged to take a continuous improvement approach to- wards their performance. Contractors will accumulate demerit points for any of 12 infractions, based on IO criteria and linked to its P3 project agreements; they may also be given points for good performance. Four or more in- fractions in the 24-month period before Ontario sets standards for contractors the RFQ submission deadline, though, "will affect you on a future procurement," Dicker said. "If you were delayed, we need to know that. We need to know your schedule. If you're late, we need a new work schedule. Performance criteria isn't yes or no; it can be disputed, and we will adjust the scores if we're wrong," Dicker said, adding that "poor performance can affect a whole team. We want team members [including bankers and other partners on a project] to ask a construction contractor, 'What's your score?'" Scores will be updated on a monthly ba- sis, she said, and will remain confidential. IO is arranging one-on-one meetings with contractors about scorecards so that they understand what the program means and can provide input. "We've met with sev- eral of the associations that represent their memberships," which have all been briefed on the program, Dicker reported. Dispute Resolution Tim Murphy, a partner in McMillan LLP in Toronto, discussed some of the problems seen in dispute resolution. Exceedingly few cases that his firm has seen have gone to arbitration, he said; however, one recurring problem is that of poor scheduling and fall- ing behind. e construction contractor is "being given a bunch of stuff earlier on in the project. What happens is, they wake up a few months later, they realize they have an accumulation of very small things," and deadlines have been missed. Another source of friction can be sub- contractors, and McMillan LLP has been involved in disputes "where major subs have been involved," Murphy said. In many of these cases the cost of resolution can be high. Subs oen don't have the ability to carry cash, and "one thing we have seen is … to get the authority [from Infrastructure Ontario] to write a cheque … requires some Infrastructure Ontario chooses annual PPP conference to announce new vendor performance program BY ELIZABETH RAYMER INFR ASTRUCTURE SPECIAL From left: Marni Dicker, Infrastructure Ontario; Andrée M. Blais, Nossaman LLP; Catherine Doyle, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP; Timothy Murphy, McMillan LLP; Tara Mackay, Torys LLP

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Lexpert Magazine - Jan/Feb 2017