Lexpert Special Editions

Special Edition on Litigation 2016

The Lexpert Special Editions profiles selected Lexpert-ranked lawyers whose focus is in Corporate, Infrastructure, Energy and Litigation law and relevant practices. It also includes feature articles on legal aspects of Canadian business issues.

Issue link: https://digital.carswellmedia.com/i/754209

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 6 of 43

WWW.LEXPERT.CA | 2016 | LEXPERT 7 to court, I doubt we would even have had an ex- change of pleadings in a year." MacDonald offers the anecdote as just one pos- sible example of how arbitration may be prefer- able to litigation. "Litigation today is prohibitively expensive and getting more so," he says. "It is also very time-consuming, so it should be avoided, if possible, at all costs." Of course, litigation may still be the best mech- anism to resolve particular disputes — or, in some cases, the only one acceptable to one or more par- ties involved — but there's little doubt that, with some exceptions, it's the least economical option, in terms of time and money. Delays in resolving a litigated dispute, which obviously contribute significantly to the cost, are a serious problem, says Ian Binnie, QC, a retired Supreme Court of Canada judge and partner at Lenczner Slaght Royce Smith Griffin LLP in To- ronto. "I think there's a general concern within the legal profession that the courts are not delivering a fast enough service. If you're looking for a trial in excess of five days [in duration], you're months, if not years, away from trial. Most businesses can't afford to wait around that long." Binnie says many corporate counsel "are fairly obsessed with the topic of avoiding litigation." In addition to their concerns about time and cost, "I think it's [also] the desire to deal with things privately within arbitration or mediation. I think they feel that, when they get to court, they have pretty well lost control over a situation." While mediation and arbitration are the prin- cipal alternatives to litigation, Cliff Lax, QC, a partner in the Toronto firm Lax O'Sullivan Lisus Gottlieb LLP, notes that the best way to reduce the possibility of a costly dispute is to properly conduct business transactions in the first place. "[at] would involve proper documentation, clarification of any ambiguous aspects of a commercial litiga- tion and proper due diligence at the outset of a re- lationship among other responsibilities." Another avoidable pathway to litigation, says Tina Cicchetti, a partner in the Vancouver of- fice of Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP, is for the parties to understand the difference between a legal dispute and a business one. "e business people [sometimes] haven't applied themselves to the problem to make sure it's actually a legal dis- pute," she says. "I think that's when things typical- ly get off the rails, right from the start." MacDonald oen advises lawyers working within corporations to have a trained litigator review a significant contract before it's finalized. "We tend to read things differently [from them]," he says. "I'm looking for potential problems. I oen pick up things that showed confusion or weren't as clear as they could be. I oen say, 'You can pay me a little now or a whole lot later.'" Blair, QC, John D. Borden Ladner Gervais LLP (403) 232-9723 jblair@blg.com Mr. Blair is the leader of BLG's Commercial Litigation Group. His practice focuses on broker/advisor liability and investigations, employee misconduct, securities class actions, shareholder disputes, take-over bid defences, secu- rities regulatory hearings, corporate investigations, plans of arrangement and cross-border civil and regulatory matters. Bjorkquist, Sonia L. Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP (416) 862-5876 sbjorkquist@osler.com Ms. Bjorkquist defends companies in class actions, commercial arbitration and other complex litigation, including product liability, director/officer liability and business-critical issues relating to commercial agreements. Bishop, David C. Gowling WLG (403) 298-1941 david.bishop@gowlingwlg.com Mr. Bishop practises corporate/commercial litigation with an emphasis on directors' and officers' defence, product liability, professional liability disputes, shareholder disputes, class actions, large property claims and environmental litigation. Binnie, CC, QC, Ian Lenczner Slaght Royce Smith Griffin LLP (416) 865-3737 ibinnie@litigate.com Mr. Binnie, a former SCC Justice, draws on his judicial insights and courtroom experience as counsel to share strategic and practical advice. He frequently receives appointments as arbitrator and mediator both domestically and internationally. Benchetrit, George Chaitons LLP (416) 218-1141 george@chaitons.com Mr. Benchetrit brings more than 20 years of experience in the areas of cor- porate restructurings, bankruptcy and insolvency, and commercial litigation. He regularly represents shareholders of private companies in the context of disputes, both in court proceedings and in alternative dispute processes. Bell, Derek J. Bennett Jones LLP (416) 777-4638 belld@bennettjones.com Mr. Bell's practice focuses on Commercial List litigation, including merger and acquisition litigation and insolvency matters, and competition litigation. He represents a wide variety of industries and business sectors, including public issuers, individual directors and officers, banks, securities dealers, manufacturers, and private and public investment funds. LEXPERT-RANKED LAWYERS

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Lexpert Special Editions - Special Edition on Litigation 2016