Lexpert Magazine

June 2016

Lexpert magazine features articles and columns on developments in legal practice management, deals and lawsuits of interest in Canada, the law and business issues of interest to legal professionals and businesses that purchase legal services.

Issue link: https://digital.carswellmedia.com/i/688578

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 62 of 83

LEXPERT MAGAZINE | JUNE 2016 63 | ABORIGINAL NEGOTIATIONS | work for ongoing communications and partnership over the life of the project; training and employment; and contract- ing opportunities or revenue sharing, "where appropriate." In return, Treacy says, the project pro- ponent receives clear support and sign-off on project details by the local Aboriginal community. But all experts stress that ev- ery indigenous group has its own priorities and, where IBAs are concerned, no one size fits all. A single project may entail separate confidential. But confidentiality may soon be swept aside by the new Extractive Sec- tor Transparency Measures Act, aimed at supporting international anti-corruption efforts. e Act requires energy and min- ing companies to disclose all payments to governments exceeding $100,000 per year in any one of seven categories, and this will include First Nations governments as of June 1, 2017. Isaac says that in future this could lead to public disclosure of agreement terms that would previously have been confidential — potentially making negotiations more difficult, rather than less so, and likely more expensive. And he wonders whether Ottawa has dual objectives in extending the Act to cover First Nations. "What's the purpose of disclosure?" he asks. "Is it anti- corruption or is it guiding the market?" Nadir André, a partner with Borden Ladner Gervais LLP in Montréal and him- self a member of the Schefferville, Que., Innu community, says freedom of con- tract may provide Aboriginal groups and companies a partial solution to the current logjam between Ottawa, the provinces and First Nations. André advises his Aborigi- nal clients that taking a project developer to court should be a last resort in the effort to ensure access to economic opportunity. "I tell clients, it's like you take a quarter and you flip it. You win or you lose." Far better, he says, to negotiate for mutual ben- efit. Beginning in 2010, the Innu of Schef- ferville intermittently blockaded four iron mines and have since negotiated IBAs with all but one. André cautions companies that, to be successful, deals must be adapted to Ab- original realities and this takes considerable forethought. He cites the Innu agreement with Tata Steel as a leading example. In addition to training, employment and con- tracting opportunities, as well as financial participation in the mine, he says, the Innu secured agreement that all project foremen would be bilingual, to accommodate the fact that the second language of the na- tive community is French, not English. In counterbalance, Aboriginal workers were required to learn some basic English. To maintain a focus on living up to train- ing and employment commitments, André says, the company agreed to hire two train- ing and employment coordinators — one negotiations with each of two or more Ab- original groups and Treacy says that, in her experience, a lack of understanding of dif- ferences among Aboriginal communities is one of three frequent contributors when negotiations fail. e other two are begin- ning consultations too late in the develop- ment process and a lack of trust, respect and ongoing communications. "In other words," she says, "hurried, one- off consultations do not work." Tom Isaac, with Osler, Hoskin & Har- court LLP in Calgary, says companies have to know the business case for their project in reasonable detail before they contem- plate negotiating an IBA. And, he adds, there's no standard-form contract. "ere's no cookie-cutter approach. Companies want to know, 'What's the market rate for an IBA?' ere isn't one. What makes a good deal for one company or one Aborigi- nal group may not work for another com- pany or another Aboriginal group." Isaac adds that companies have to under- stand that in negotiations with First Na- tions "there's not necessarily a willing buyer and a willing seller." Aboriginal priorities may not include a major mining project or pipeline. "You could be talking a differ- ent language," which he says will require a company to take a step back, be patient and seek creative solutions. THERE'S ALSO the emerging issue that both companies and First Nations have tra- ditionally preferred to keep financial terms HEATHER TREACY > DLA PIPER (CANADA) LLP "This is becoming a serious situation for our nation as a whole and it directly affects the functioning of the economy. We're really at a juncture where, if we want continued economic prosperity in Canada, we need to address these issues and come to a resolution."

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Lexpert Magazine - June 2016