Lexpert US Guides

Litigation 2015

The Lexpert Guides to the Leading US/Canada Cross-Border Corporate and Litigation Lawyers in Canada profiles leading business lawyers and features articles for attorneys and in-house counsel in the US about business law issues in Canada.

Issue link: https://digital.carswellmedia.com/i/597942

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 27 of 119

28 | LEXPERT • December 2015 | www.lexpert.ca NAFTA invalidated two of its drug patents. e courts ruled Eli Lilly's applications failed to meet the Paul Lalonde Dentons Canada LLP "NAFTA HAS NO ABILITY to declare illegal or to reverse a government measure. It only provides that where those measures breach the very specific commitments of Chapter 11, the government may have to pay compensation to foreign companies that are harmed." standards needed to issue a new drug patent. Lilly argues Canadian courts have been "retroactively" applying a new, tougher standard for patents since 2005. A Canadian govern- ment filing said that Eli Lilly "now seeks to have this Tribunal misapply NAFTA Ch. 11 and transform itself into a suprana- tional court of appeal." "Eli Lilly is appealing to a NAFTA panel a decision made by the Supreme Court of Canada," says Herman, "and that is a novel development." He is concerned about the Chapter 11 process being extended beyond its intended scope. "e concept was to deal with egregious government measures that were arbitrary and unfair. It was not thought that investment arbitration would be used to challenge judicial decisions." In Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Government of Canada, the claim arises from a moratorium on shale gas exploration (fracking) legis- lated by the Québec government in 2012 and the nullification of permits previously granted to Lone Pine and other oil and gas investors. "We're not challenging the moratorium," says Pearson, whose law firm acts for Lone Pine. "We're simply challenging the expropriation of rights with no compensation." e company, headquartered in Calgary but incorporated in Delaware, is one of many major natural gas companies affected by Québec's moratorium. Winning a NAFTA case against Québec's fracking policy would be "an uphill battle," says Herman, since the policy has a legitimate purpose, and does not appear to discriminate against foreign firms. A new legal powerhouse. Highly regarded litigators Marie Henein and Scott Hutchison are Fellows of the American College of Trial Lawyers, members of the Supreme Court Advocacy Institute and authors of frequently cited texts. They have been recognized for their excellence in trial and appellate advocacy, appearing frequently at the Supreme Court of Canada and the Ontario Court of Appeal. Strategic and creative thinking. Their entire team of outstanding lawyers offers experience in criminal, quasi-criminal, regulatory and cross-border litigation. More experience. More defence. hhllp.ca P OW E R I N E X P E R I E N C E . HeneinHutchison_CL_Feb_15.indd 1 2015-01-14 1:44 PM Sheldon Gordon is a business and legal-affairs writer based in Toronto.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Lexpert US Guides - Litigation 2015