Lexpert US Guides

Litigation 2015

The Lexpert Guides to the Leading US/Canada Cross-Border Corporate and Litigation Lawyers in Canada profiles leading business lawyers and features articles for attorneys and in-house counsel in the US about business law issues in Canada.

Issue link: https://digital.carswellmedia.com/i/597942

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 12 of 119

www.lexpert.ca | LEXPERT • December 2015 | 13 GOOD FAITH define or delimit them in a particular context so long as they maintain the minimum standard that a particular duty implies. "Although the decision doesn't give any specifics about when the parties can try to limit the need to communicate honestly, I do think it will change the way contracts are draed," Lederman says. "For example, lawyers might expand on absolute discretion by expressly stating that a right can be exercised for any reason at all or that no reason need be given for the exercise of a right." Certainly, the duty of good faith has impacted draing and negotiating practice in the various states, including New York, California, Texas and Illinois, which have espoused the duty in their laws — in some cases for almost a century. It seems likely, then, that Bhasin will tend to complicate contract negotiations in Canada. "What I'm starting to notice is that Bhasin is becoming a top-of- mind issue for in-house counsel, both when they're entering into contracts and when they're making the decision to terminate them," Berman says. ACCORDING TO LARRY LOWENSTEIN of Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP in Toronto, that's not necessarily a good thing. "Parties will have to dra with precision on a point that was not previously problematic," he says. "is sets off rounds of defensive lawyer- ing that clients find difficult to understand and could produce results with which clients may find it difficult to comply." As Lowenstein sees it, however, the draing problems aren't the worst of it. "I just hope that this court, with the best of intentions, hasn't set us on a road to hell," he says. "Because even though the court may have intended its decision to be incremental, it has unwittingly unleashed something that the litigation Bar will feast on for at least a decade." e law regarding good faith was well established, at least in Ontario, says Lowenstein. Instead of creating an open-ended principle, he says, the court could have adopted a framework that Dedication, knowledge and creativity. Henein Hutchison draws its power from experience and its talent from a team of rising stars. The firm's associate ranks include three clerks of the Supreme Court of Canada and one clerk of the Court of Appeal for Ontario. Experience and depth. More experience. More defence. | www.hhllp.ca E N O U G H TA L E N T TO F I L L A R O O M . Untitled-3 1 14-04-30 12:44 PM "SOMETIMES there was a duty of good faith, sometimes there wasn't, sometimes it was implied, sometimes it was statutory, sometimes it was a matter of contractual interpretation. But in the end, you couldn't give the clients definitive advice on whether such a duty existed. Now at least we know that all contracts are subject to a 'general organizing principle' of good faith." Wendy Berman Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Lexpert US Guides - Litigation 2015