Lexpert Special Editions

Special Edition on Litigation -December 2015

The Lexpert Special Editions profiles selected Lexpert-ranked lawyers whose focus is in Corporate, Infrastructure, Energy and Litigation law and relevant practices. It also includes feature articles on legal aspects of Canadian business issues.

Issue link: https://digital.carswellmedia.com/i/597165

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 19 of 43

20 | Competition Guay, François Smart & Biggar /Fetherstonhaugh (514) 954-1500 fguay@smart-biggar.ca Mr. Guay's IP litigation practice focuses on patents, trademarks, industrial designs, copyright, unfair com- petition, trade secrets and computer-related technology. His briefs embrace extraordinary recourses such as in- junctions and seizures. Halfnight, Jamieson Halfnight & McKinlay Professional Corporation (416) 361-3082 jhalfnight@halfnightlaw.com Recognized as one of the top insurance lawyers in Canada, Mr. Halfnight conducts a specialty insurance and reinsurance litiga- tion practice, advising clients both in Canada and internationally, and appearing in both trial and appellate courts. Hausman, David A. Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP (416) 868-3486 dhausman@fasken.com Mr. Hausman practises exclusively in the field of securities litigation. He represents investment dealers, public compan- ies, mutual funds and directors & officers in regulatory and civil pro- ceedings and internal investigations across Canada. Gunn, QC, FCIArb, Angus M. Borden Ladner Gervais LLP (604) 640-4084 agunn@blg.com Mr. Gunn's practice emphasizes commercial dispute resolution, with a focus on appellate liti- gation and international and domestic arbitra- tion and mediation. He also lectures at UBC's Allard School of Law and is very active in the pro bono community. Harrison, Robert S. Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP (416) 865-4384 rharrison@fasken.com Mr. Harrison's trial and appeal practice includes securities and environmental law, financial institutions, shareholders' remedies, insurance, directors' and officers' liability, IP, professional negligence, class actions and insolvencies. Hitchman, Carol V.E. Gardiner Roberts LLP (416) 865-8259 chitchman@grllp.com Ms. Hitchman is a part- ner in the Technology & Intellectual Property Group at Gardiner Rob- erts LLP. Her practice focuses primarily on intellectual property liti- gation, which includes experience as a litigator and a Patent and Trade-mark Agent. that have a credible and effective program in place, even if they are involved in a violation of the Act. e Bulletin "sets the bar relatively high in terms of expec- tations of what clients should do to have effective compli- ance programs in place," says Anita Banicevic, a partner at Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP in Toronto. Some of the new requirements, like having an officer tasked to report to the Board on compliance matters, "might catch companies by surprise," Banicevic says. Particularly demand- ing may be the require- ment for an anti-trust audit. "You have to take a look at your business and see if there are any [anti-compet- itive] issues coming up. It's not something that's widely done in Canada or even the US," says Banicevic. Large corporations in Canada would have compliance programs in place that are "pretty comprehensive and rigor- ous," says Randal Hughes, a partner at Bennett Jones LLP in Toronto. "But the Bulletin may be aimed at smaller busi- nesses or businesses that have grown from smaller to larger and that may not have had a recognition of the importance of compliance with competition laws." Companies have previously benefited from leniency – avoiding higher fines or criminal prosecution – if they co- operated with the Bureau. What's new is the fine reduction available if a company allows the Bureau to evaluate whether it had a credible and effective compliance program in place. is is a more formal process than existed in the past. "You may want to take advantage of fine reduction," says Banicevic, "but are you prepared to allow the Bureau to look at your files? Is that worth it to you from a business risk per- spective? It's a risk/reward analysis at that point." e Bureau cites three recent cases involving the Ontario water heater industry as "perfect examples of shared compli- ance." e Bureau reached resolutions with Reliance Com- fort Limited Partnership in an abuse of dominance case, with EnerCare Inc. in a mergers case, and with National Energy Corporation in a false or misleading representations case. "ese resolutions strengthen competition and con- LEXPERT®Ranked Lawyers "THE [COMPETITION BUREAU] SETS THE BAR RELATIVELY HIGH IN TERMS OF EXPECTATIONS OF WHAT CLIENTS SHOULD DO TO HAVE EFFECTIVE COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS IN PLACE." – Anita Banicevic, Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Lexpert Special Editions - Special Edition on Litigation -December 2015