Lexpert Special Editions

Special Edition on Energy -Nov 2015

The Lexpert Special Editions profiles selected Lexpert-ranked lawyers whose focus is in Corporate, Infrastructure, Energy and Litigation law and relevant practices. It also includes feature articles on legal aspects of Canadian business issues.

Issue link: https://digital.carswellmedia.com/i/583167

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 21 of 51

Harle, Kimberly A. Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (416) 863-4294 kim.harle@blakes.com Ms. Harle's practice includes a broad range of M&A, private equity and pension fund investment work, with a focus on energy, technol- ogy, financial services and real estate. Harricks, Paul H. Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP (416) 369-7296 paul.harricks@gowlings.com Mr. Harricks leads Gowl- ings's Energy, Infrastructure & Mining Group. His trans- action-based practice embra- ces infrastructure, energy and project finance. He acts for Canadian and international corporations, funds and financial institutions. Harvie, Alan S. Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP (403) 267-9411 alan.harvie@nortonroseful- bright.com Mr. Harvie practises energy and environmental/regula- tory law including commer- cial and operational issues, focusing on the upstream oil and gas, energy, waste dispos- al and chemical industries. Harper, Dufferin R. Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (403) 260-9710 dufferin.harper@blakes.com Mr. Harper acts for clients on environmental due dili- gence and liability issues, and provides regulatory compli- ance and impact assessment advice to oil & gas compan- ies, companies operating in the oil sands, and liquefied natural gas proponents. Harrison, QC, Elizabeth J. Farris, Vaughan, Wills & Murphy LLP (604) 661-9367 eharrison@farris.com Mrs. Harrison has extensive experience in corporate, M&A and securities trans- actions. Represents corpora- tions and investment dealers. Experience includes M&A, take-overs and related-party transactions, and public and private financings. Heard, Joel A. Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP (416) 862-6847 jheard@osler.com Mr. Heard's practice focuses on construction law, energy and infrastructure. He advises clients on project structuring, procurement, contract documentation, risk identification and mitiga- tion, financing and project execution issues. 22 | CONTINUOUS DISCLOSURE LEXPERT ® RANKED LAWYERS disclosure by publically listed Canadian companies. In 59 per cent of those cases re- viewed, the CSA ordered issuers to improve or amend their disclosure. Some issuers were referred to enforcement or had cease trade orders issued against them because of failures to disclose pertinent information. On July 1, CSA amendments for several "national instruments" – rules that apply to publically listed companies headquartered in all provinces and territories – came into force. For Calgary-based lawyer Roy Hud- son, a partner with DLA Piper who works primarily with junior oil and gas explora- tion and production companies, the biggest concern for his clients are amendments to National Instrument 51-101 Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas. "I guess on the energy side the one thing that has been difficult particularly for ju- niors is disclosure of not reserves, but where companies are in a stage of development where [new assets] haven't been classified as reserves," says Hudson. Many smaller oil companies, he explains, in addition to filing detailed mandatory disclosures of their property and indepen- dently audited reserves, voluntarily disclose what are known as contingent and prospec- tive resources. Junior companies especially, as they attempt to attract investors, oen list these prospective or contingent resourc- tinuous disclosure obligations, says lawyer Ross Bentley, a partner at Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP in Calgary who specializes in mergers & acquisitions and corporate fi- nance in the energy sector. e Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) issues national rules for publicly listed companies. Recently, says Bentley, it "put issuers on notice that they will not ac- cept boiler plate statements" when it comes to certain kinds of continuous disclosure re- quirements. "Rather they are looking for is- suers to disclose and specifically quantify, in sufficient detail, information for investors to be able to understand clearly a company's financial circumstances." e CSA wants oil and gas companies to disclose greater information on matters such as the cash flow necessary to fund cur- rent operations and to satisfy obligations such as maintaining payments on debt facil- ities and dividends. ey are, explains Bent- ley, "seeking clarity on any significant risks of defaults on dividend payments, debt pay- ments, debt covenants or other contractual obligations." ey also want companies to do more to inform investors about their current and future ability to find funding sources through debt and credit facilities in the current economic climate. "What they are looking for is to ensure there is a clear road map for investors to interpret the impact of this strain that issu- ers are facing." However, the CSA has ex- pressed concern about the past muddiness of those road maps, which could steer inves- tors into a ditch. In July, the CSA released a review of con- tinuous disclosure programs for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015. Noting that "investors deserve high-quality disclosure as they rely on this information to make informed investment decisions," the CSA conducted 1058 reviews of continuous "THE INDUSTRY IS a very resilient, flexible industry filled with very smart people. What the industry can deal with... and make it look effortless is certainty. They like to know what their playing field is, and what their rules are." – William S. Osler, Bennett Jones LLP

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Lexpert Special Editions - Special Edition on Energy -Nov 2015