Lexpert US Guides

Corporate 2015

The Lexpert Guides to the Leading US/Canada Cross-Border Corporate and Litigation Lawyers in Canada profiles leading business lawyers and features articles for attorneys and in-house counsel in the US about business law issues in Canada.

Issue link: https://digital.carswellmedia.com/i/522960

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 7 of 135

8 | LEXPERT • June 2015 | www.lexpert.ca/usguide-corporate/ « CORPORATE GOVERNANCE NEW TAKE-OVER BID REGIME In March 2015, the Canadian Securities Administrators released for comment dra rules on what some observers have been calling a new "just say slow" take- over regime. e proposed rules mandate that a take-over bid must remain open for 120 days, though target boards may in certain cases shorten that period to 35 days. Shareholders will still have their say on a bid by way of a new 50 per cent minimum tender condition. If the minimum condition is met, undecided shareholders will have 10 days to accept. Exemptions are unchanged under the new rules. Under the current regime, directors must issue a circular evaluating the bid within 15 days, and bids must remain open for only 35 days. While defensive measures such as poison pills are frequently used to buy time, bidders can gener- ally obtain regulatory orders to cease trade the pills within 60 days. " e new regime takes the sting out of the process by setting bright-line ground rules," says Alfred Page in Borden Ladner Gervais LLP's Toronto offi ce. "While that makes things easier for bidders in some ways, it makes it harder in others." e extended bid length, for example, gives other interested bidders a longer period to intervene, creating uncertainty for the initial bidders, especially if they are hostile. In turn, the uncertainty can give boards more negotiating leverage. "We anticipate that hostile bidders will perceive the benefi t of engaging more with target boards who will have the ability to waive the minimum tender period for friendly transactions," write John Emanoilidis, Andrew Gray, omas Yeo and Sophia Tolias in Torys LLP's client bulletin. According to the Torys lawyers, poison pills will still be useful as a device to regulate exempt purchases of target securities. "However, we would expect that the regulators would not generally permit a target board to maintain a poison pill if a bid has been accepted by a majority of disinterested shareholders and if the bid otherwise complies with the new rules," they write. e comment period for the dra rules closed on June 29, 2015. Corporate governance and shareholder activism have seen a number of key developments recently in Canada JULIUS MELNITZER ACTIVISM AND GOVERNANCE ACTIVISM ACTIVISM PHOTO: SHUTTERSTOCK

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Lexpert US Guides - Corporate 2015