Lexpert Special Editions

Special Edition on Corporate -June 2015

The Lexpert Special Editions profiles selected Lexpert-ranked lawyers whose focus is in Corporate, Infrastructure, Energy and Litigation law and relevant practices. It also includes feature articles on legal aspects of Canadian business issues.

Issue link: https://digital.carswellmedia.com/i/515673

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 14 of 39

Fraiberg, Jeremy D. Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP (416) 862-6505 jfraiberg@osler.com Mr. Fraiberg, Co-chair of the Mining Group, practises corporate and securities law with an emphasis on M&A and corporate fi nance. He acts for public and private companies, private-equity funds and investment banks on a range of transactions. Fung, William Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (416) 863-2356 william.fung@blakes.com Mr. Fung's practice focuses on corporate fi nance & pub- lic M&A deals, with exper- tise on REITs & income funds. His recent REIT experience includes the Choice Properties REIT & American Hotel REIT LP off erings & the H&R REIT purchase of Primaris REIT. Gamble, Ian J. orsteinssons LLP (604) 602-4290 gamble@thor.ca Mr. Gamble's tax practice focuses on corporate-related matters in the telecom, real estate, mining, and oil and gas industries. He taught at UBC's law faculty, and speaks and writes regularly. He is the author of Taxa- tion of Canadian Mining. Fraser, Jean M. Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP (416) 862-6537 jfraser@osler.com Ms. Fraser advises boards and senior management of public and private compan- ies, principally on complex governance, M&A and corporate fi nance matters. She has been lead counsel on many of Canada's most signifi cant transactions. Gallivan, QC, Daniel F. Cox & Palmer (902) 491-4126 dgallivan@ coxandpalmer.com Mr. Gallivan's practice is primarily transactional, focusing on corporate, fi - nance, securities, energy and public law for corporations, governments, professional organizations and fi nancial institutions. Mr. Gallivan is the CEO of Cox & Palmer. Geraghty, Sharon C. Torys LLP (416) 865-8138 sgeraghty@torys.com Ms. Geraghty is a senior part- ner in Torys's M&A Group. Practises M&A, corporate governance and securities law, with an emphasis on complex public and private acquisition transactions. vote "for" a nominee or to "withhold" a vote. Under the new regime, a director who receives a majority of "withhold" votes has to resign. A TSX survey of 200 listees queried in 2013 found that 76 per cent had already adopted majority voting policies. ! e ma- jority voting requirement follows earlier TSX-led governance reforms in 2012 that required directors to be elected annually and individually — rather than collectively as part of a slate. "No one wants to come in last on the bal- lot," says Olasker at Davies. "While direc- tors aren't campaigning, they have in mind the potential impact of their decisions on how they will come out in that vote. Sit- ting on a compensation committee that ap- proves a rich executive contract will now be a decision that directors will take with more thought on whether they'll be targeted in the next round." SAY ON PAY ! e number of public companies voluntari- ly adopting a say-on-pay vote – a sharehold- er vote approving the company's executive compensation arrangements – will likely continue to rise. Say-on-pay votes started in Canada in 2010 at the major banks' AGMs. Of the S&P/TSX 60 Index companies, 81.7 per cent gave stockholders a say on pay in 2014, ac- cording to Davies Governance Insights 2014. However, only one-third of approximately 250 companies in the S&P/TSX Com- posite Index have done so. Where sharehold- ers have revolted on pay, they've been heeded, says Hansell. She notes that Barrick Gold Corp. received an 85.2 per cent "no" vote on its compensation structure two years ago. "! ey heard the investors loud and clear and made changes to their compensation. Even if 30 per cent of the votes were 'no,' boards pay attention to that." PROXY ADVISORY FIRMS Listed companies complain when they receive negative recommendations from proxy advisory fi rms, especially based on in- accuracies or on the issuers' failure to meet "PEOPLE HAVE TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE [OF GENDER DIVERSITY]. THE LIKELY SCENARIO IS, 'WE HAVEN'T TURNED OUR MINDS TO IT, AND NOW WE WILL.' ONCE BOARDS ENGAGE IN THE PROCESS OF IDENTIFYING QUALIFIED WOMEN, THEY WILL SEE THERE ARE LOTS OF THEM. I THINK IT WILL ACTUALLY BREAK THE BARRIER." – Carol Hansell, Hansell LLP CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | 15

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Lexpert Special Editions - Special Edition on Corporate -June 2015