Lexpert US Guides

Litigation 2014

The Lexpert Guides to the Leading US/Canada Cross-Border Corporate and Litigation Lawyers in Canada profiles leading business lawyers and features articles for attorneys and in-house counsel in the US about business law issues in Canada.

Issue link: https://digital.carswellmedia.com/i/423776

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 19 of 135

20 | LEXPERT • December 2014 | www.lexpert.ca TRADEMARKS PHOTO: SHUTTERSTOCK IN TRADEMARK LAW THE YEAR 2015 will see a dramatic alteration in Canada's trademark landscape, with perhaps the most signifi cant changes to the trademark regime since 1868. e federal government has adopted amendments to the Trade-marks Act through an omnibus Budget Implementation Bill (Bill C-31, Economic Action Plan 2014 Act, No. 1). e legislation will take eff ect following a public consultation on application fees, which suggests its implementation will not be until next year. "I would expect we're looking at less certainty, less predictability, and that usually points to more litigation and more oppositions," says Judith Robinson, IP litigation partner at Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP in Montréal. " is is going to lead to greater costs for business concerns that hold trademarks." e key amendment will eliminate use as a prerequisite to registration of a trademark. Currently, trademark applications can be fi led on the basis of "proposed use," but registration can't be obtained until a "declaration of use" is fi led stating the date when use began in Canada or elsewhere. Under C-31, "we will move to a system where registration can be obtained without use," says Robinson. " e modifi cations shi the burden largely to the business owners to police these issues." "Our system of priority to trademark rights is still [going to be] based on fi rst use," says Chris Wilson, IP litigation partner of Bull, Housser & Tupper LLP in Vancouver, "but we're just taking that information out of the register. So it gets easier to register the trademark, but far more expensive to [determine if there is a basis] for oppositions, infringement actions and expungement actions. It makes work for lawyers." e amendments could crowd the register with "deadwood" trademarks and have the undesired eff ect of encouraging "squatters" to apply for registration. " e concern is you'll have somebody fi le and obtain registrations on well-known marks where the legitimate trademark owner is going to be approached to purchase the mark for a fee," says Upcoming amendments to the Trade-marks Act will mean signifi cant changes, and uncertainty, for businesses operating in Canada BY SHELDON GORDON BIG CHANGES

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Lexpert US Guides - Litigation 2014