Lexpert Special Editions

2014 Special Edition - Litigation

The Lexpert Special Editions profiles selected Lexpert-ranked lawyers whose focus is in Corporate, Infrastructure, Energy and Litigation law and relevant practices. It also includes feature articles on legal aspects of Canadian business issues.

Issue link: https://digital.carswellmedia.com/i/423404

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 9 of 39

10 | Privacy Litigation Cherniak, QC, Earl A. Lerners LLP (416) 601-2350 echerniak@lerners.ca Mr. Cherniak is a domestic and international commercial arbitrator and senior counsel with wide experience in appellate advocacy, professional responsibility, securities and insurance litigation, and constitutional and administrative law. Chiasson, Craig R. Borden Ladner Gervais LLP (604) 640-4221 cchiasson@blg.com Mr. Chiasson focuses on international commercial and investment treaty arbitration, and complex commercial disputes. Has experience in proceedings administered by all the major arbitral institutions, ad hoc arbitrations and British Columbia courts. Cicchetti, Tina Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP (604) 631-4868 tcicchetti@fasken.com Ms. Cicchetti is counsel and arbitrator in domestic and international commercial and investment arbitration. Her experience embraces M&A, shareholder, construction and distribution matters in ICC, AAA, ICDR, JCAA, Swiss and other proceedings. Chernos, David Chernos Flaherty Svonkin LLP (416) 855-0402 dchernos@ cfscounsel.com Practice focuses on corporate and commercial litigation, with an emphasis on insolvency, restructuring, income tax, directors' liability and insurance, estates litigation and shareholders' disputes in closely held companies. Chua, Chia-yi McCarthy Tétrault LLP (416) 601-7715 cchua@mccarthy.ca Mr. Chua leads McCarthy's national tax litigation group. Apart from his courtroom work, he is also well known for securing imaginative out-of-court settlements for corporate clients, and constantly making his practice marketplace- relevant. Cohen, Robert B. Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP (416) 869-5425 rcohen@ casselsbrock.com Mr. Cohen has a commercial litigation and arbitration practice focused on shareholder disputes for both private and public companies. He also advises boards of directors in addressing shareholder activism and regulatory matters. LEXPERT®Ranked Lawyers and eff ort to challenge the OCA ruling. Meanwhile, he says, to mitigate potential damages for vicarious liability, companies need to review data security measures, implement privacy protection policies, consider whether there's a need to notify aff ected customers or em- ployees in the event of a breach and evaluate every incident to prevent recurrence. On a purely person-to-person level, Smith says, those seeking redress for cyber bullying might consider using this tort in cases such as hacking and dissemination of an elec- tronic diary. He concedes that it's a conduct typically associ- ated with teens, and it seems very unlikely parents of a teen- age defendant could be found liable in such a situation. "But I've learned that some teens have more assets than you might expect," and in other cases, it might not be about the money. "To some victims, it might be less about the damages than the acknowledgement that they've been wronged," he says. " e fact that the damages are symbolic does refl ect the reality that, on a certain level, this is not about the money." Smith's BLG colleague, Barry Glaspell, says money is the least of the reasons he thinks the new tort should be struck down — but it's still worth considering. A er winning her case, Glaspell points out that Jones owed her lawyer $130,000, less the $10,000 court award. Jones then sued her lawyer and he counterclaimed, seeking $68,000 for unpaid fees. Ontario Superior Court found for the lawyer and awarded additional costs of $16,000 against Jones for the second lawsuit. It all underscores the point that distress and mental an- guish are not fi t matters to bring before the courts, Glaspell says. " e law doesn't correct everything by transferring a bit of money from one person to another. "I think our judges are suffi ciently busy with serious cases that they don't need to consider cases where there's no cause of action," Glaspell says. "We can all agree that what hap- pened [in Jones] was wrong, off ensive, even 'highly off ensive.' I just don't think everything that happens to us should have a remedy in court." Furthermore, Glaspell says, the new common law tort in- trudes upon an area already occupied by statute law (passed Photo: Shutterstock

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Lexpert Special Editions - 2014 Special Edition - Litigation