Lexpert Special Editions

Special Edition on Energy - Nov 2014

The Lexpert Special Editions profiles selected Lexpert-ranked lawyers whose focus is in Corporate, Infrastructure, Energy and Litigation law and relevant practices. It also includes feature articles on legal aspects of Canadian business issues.

Issue link: https://digital.carswellmedia.com/i/406912

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 28 of 55

Lexpert®Ranked Lawyers Labeau, Pierre- Christian Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP (418) 640-5008 pierre-christian. labeau@ nortonrosefulbright. com Mr. Labeau practises Native, constitutional and administrative law. He advises public agencies, corporations and banks, and other clients on issues related to energy, mining and forestry development, including IBAs and the duty to consult. Lalji, Amyn F. Miller Thomson LLP (604) 643-1201 alalji@millerthomson. com Mr. Lalji has represented First Nations in negotiations with industry in relation to some of Canada's largest mining projects. He has also acted for First Nations businesses in negotiating major procurement deals for large mining projects. Lawrence, Bruce A. Borden Ladner Gervais LLP (403) 232-9597 blawrence@blg.com Mr. Lawrence's practice focuses on the oil and gas sector, both on and offshore. His experience includes seismic acquisition through exploration and on to development and production, JVs and operating agreements, M&A and take-over bids. Laffin, QC, Michael J. Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (403) 260-9692 michael.laffi n@blakes. com Mr. Laffin provides corporate and energy advice to Canadian and international oil and gas companies, and has extensive experience negotiating, structuring and advising on all aspects of conventional and unconventional oil and gas, and LNG matters. Langlois, Martin R. Stikeman Elliott LLP (416) 869-5672 mlanglois@stikeman. com Mr. Langlois is co- head of the M&A and Private Equity Practice Group in Toronto. His practice focuses on M&A, securities and corporate governance matters in various industries including technology, life sciences, fi nancial services and energy. Lefebvre, David R.J. Gowling Lafl eur Henderson LLP (403) 298-1978 david.lefebvre@ gowlings.com Mr. Lefebvre's practice focuses on Canadian and cross-border M&A, private-equity transactions, capital markets, large project and corporate governance matters. He sits on the Securities Advisory Committee of the Alberta Securities Commission. LNG | 29 has made the LNG in those deals cheaper to buy. "So the question is, is what the [BC] government is proposing going to make us competitive vis-à-vis our principal competitors?" e industry itself has given us a good hint at the answer: soon a er BC proposed the tax regime several developers – including Petronas, Apache Corp. and one of Quesnel's clients, Shell Canada – either sold down equity or reduced capital expenditures on their Canadian LNG projects. Since then, the BC government has indicated it will take a second look at the tax. ere's another new wrinkle facing the nascent Canadian LNG. On June 26 in a historic decision, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) unanimously held – in Tsilhqot'in Nation v. British Columbia – that even in absence of treaties, Aborig- inal title exists. e ruling substantially lowers the proof required to substantiate Aboriginal title to lands. Regular, though not necessarily intensive, use (as required before) of land for traditional practices such as hunting, trapping and fi shing is now suffi cient for a title claim. "Up until the Tsilhqot'in decision the obligations on both government and companies weren't particularly onerous," says Bruce McIvor, founder and principal at First Peoples Law in Vancouver. "But with this decision, it really does change the playing fi eld." In BC, compared to provinces such as Alberta and Manitoba, there are very few treaties. e SCC ruling solidifi es and in- tensifi es the duty of both government and industry to con- sult with all Aboriginal groups, regardless of whether treaties exist, when developing projects where First Nations claim sovereign rights to land. Prior to the ruling, says McIvor, many resource companies seeking government approval on projects that might impact on First Nation communities engaged in what Aboriginal advocates call "drive-by consultations." ey would log the number of times they contacted Aboriginal communities, o en for superfi cial reasons, and, before the Tsilhqot'in rul- ing, that was o en enough to fulfi l their "duty to consult." Now, warns McIvor, "the dinosaurs" – those companies that made ingenuous eff orts to work with First Nations – face a real possibility of being sued in court for damages or PHOTO COURTESY OF LNG CANADA

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Lexpert Special Editions - Special Edition on Energy - Nov 2014