Lexpert Special Editions

Corporate Law June 2014

The Lexpert Special Editions profiles selected Lexpert-ranked lawyers whose focus is in Corporate, Infrastructure, Energy and Litigation law and relevant practices. It also includes feature articles on legal aspects of Canadian business issues.

Issue link: https://digital.carswellmedia.com/i/309798

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 7 of 39

8 | SHAREHOLDER ACTIVISM Lexpert Special Edition Cannon, Douglas A. McCarthy Tétrault LLP (416) 601-7815 dcannon@mccarthy.ca Mr. Cannon is a tax partner focusing on domestic and cross-border M&A, divestitures, reorganizations, fi nancial products and investment funds. Also advises on tax aspects of business operations, including transfer pricing, and acts in CRA disputes. Carfagnini, Jay A. Goodmans LLP (416) 597-4107 jcarfagnini@goodmans.ca Mr. Carfagnini's practice includes a focus on corporate reorganizations, with an expertise in cross- border and international transactions involving the US and the UK. He has been an advisor in most recent major Canadian restructurings. Chadwick, Robert J. Goodmans LLP (416) 597-4285 rchadwick@goodmans.ca Mr. Chadwick focuses on corporate, banking, private equity, insolvency and reorganizations, and M&A law on national, cross- border and international transactions. He counsels a diverse group of clients, including boards, in various industries. Carelli, Robert Stikeman Elliott LLP (514) 397-2408 rcarelli@stikeman.com Mr. Carelli focuses on securities, corporate fi nance, public and private M&A and governance. Advises issuers and under writers in the context of public off erings and private placements, investment funds, purchasers, sellers and private- equity funds. Castiel, Peter Stikeman Elliott LLP (514) 397-3272 pcastiel@stikeman.com Mr. Castiel is head of Montreal M&A group. Focuses on cross-border M&A and corporate fi nancings. Advises private-equity funds, sovereign wealth funds, leading public and private companies in connection with acquisitions, divestitures and investments. Chaiton, Harvey G. Chaitons LLP (416) 218-1129 harvey@chaitons.com Mr. Chaiton's insolvency practice emphasizes domestic and cross- border receiverships and restructurings, including insolvency litigation. His clients include fi nancial institutions, creditors, debtors, monitors, receivers and trustees. Social Media Once Icahn had acquired a large enough position in the Calgary energy company and was ready to approach management about board representation, he tweeted the news. With the push of a button, he threw out the rulebook for running proxy cam- paigns in Canada. is was not a legendary 77-year-old investor co-opting the younger genera- tion's micro-blogging habits; this was a wily campaigner using social media to perform alchemy on Talisman's share- holder base. e tweet instantly got the attention of event-driven investors who bought Talisman in anticipation Icahn would push for a cor- porate overhaul. "People will follow a Carl Icahn or a Bill Ackman into a stock in anticipation there will be an event such as a new CEO, a sale or a new strategy," says Orestes Pasparakis of Norton Rose Ful- bright Canada LLP. at o en re- sults in 20 to 30 per cent of the shares changing hands within a week or two, says Pasparakis, co-chair of his fi rm's Canadian special situations team. e new shareholders can be counted on to back any coming board challenge at much higher levels than those who just bailed out. So, from an activist's perspective, if they accumulate 10 per cent of the company's stock themselves and have another 20 per cent of aggressive like-minded investors who follow them into the stock, he says, "all of a sudden you're at 30 per cent — which gives you a good base from which to pursue a board change." In the meantime, all the buying usually sends the share price up, which makes the activist look even better. "It makes the activist look like the smart money. At the same time it also makes them some money right up front, so it provides them with a fi nan- cial cushion. "And people suddenly want to know what the board is going to do in the face of these criticisms. ey start scrutinizing the company and looking at why the ac- tivist is coming in, what changes ought to be made and what the upside is. at puts tremendous pressure on the board." Pasparakis says the question of whether to go public right up front using social media and the Internet has quickly be- come "the dominant strategic decision in a campaign." But it's not the only one. Golden Leashes Another tactical decision that activists have had to make is whether to use gold- en leashes. e issue was thrust into the spotlight last year in the fi ght between Agrium and New York-based Jana, its largest share- holder. When the fertilizer maker reject- ed Jana's suggestion the company spin off its retail business to boost shareholder re- "ALTHOUGH AMERICAN ACTIVISTS HAVE BEEN CATALYSTS FOR CHANGE, TO THE EXTENT THAT THEY EFFECT CHANGE IT OFTEN INURES TO THE BENEFIT OF THE ENTIRE SHAREHOLDER BASE, AND THEORETICALLY TO THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY AND THE ECONOMY AS A WHOLE." – Garth Girvan, McCarthy Tétrault LLP LEXPERT ® RANKED LAWYERS

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Lexpert Special Editions - Corporate Law June 2014