Lexpert Special Editions

Corporate Law June 2014

The Lexpert Special Editions profiles selected Lexpert-ranked lawyers whose focus is in Corporate, Infrastructure, Energy and Litigation law and relevant practices. It also includes feature articles on legal aspects of Canadian business issues.

Issue link: https://digital.carswellmedia.com/i/309798

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 14 of 39

Canada's 2014 Leading Corporate Lawyers REGULATION | 15 Gans, Michael Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (416) 863-2286 michael.gans@blakes.com Mr. Gans' s practice primarily involves advising on public and private, domestic and cross-border merger & acquisition transactions. He also frequently acts for fi nancial sponsors in leveraged transactions. Gibson, QC, Brock W. Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (403) 260-9610 brock.gibson@blakes.com Chair and partner. Mr. Gibson's practice focuses on mergers and acquisitions, corporate fi nance, private-equity and restructuring transactions. His experience includes acting as lead counsel on numerous mergers and acquisitions and public off erings. Glass, Jeff Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (416) 863-4162 jeff .glass@blakes.com Mr. Glass advises leading investment dealers, fi nancial institutions and wealth management companies on public fi nancings, governance and regulator y matters, with extensive experience in the structuring and regulation of structured products. Geraghty, Sharon C. Tor ys LLP (416) 865-8138 sgeraghty@torys.com Ms. Geraghty is a senior partner in Tor ys' M&A Group. Practises M&A, corporate governance and securities law, with an emphasis on complex public and private acquisition transactions. Girvan, Garth (Gary) M. McCarthy Tétrault LLP (416) 601-7574 ggirvan@mccarthy.ca Mr. Girvan off ers extensive experience in M&A and corporate fi nance. He advises the fi rm's major corporate and fi nancial institutions and investment banking clients. Has broad familiarity with cross-border fi nancing and acquisitions. Goldman, Jay Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP (416) 860-6474 jgoldman@ casselsbrock.com Mr. Goldman's securities and corporate fi nance practice embraces structuring and negotiating M&A, securities, joint venture and commercial transactions. His clients include issuers and investment dealers/ advisors, many in the mining sector. ing period, which only commences once notifi ed parties have sent the Bureau a complete and certifi ed response to the SIR. Until that period ends, the deal cannot close. at "buys [the Bureau] a fairly sub- stantial amount of time," says Collins. " ey still have the injunctive power, but don't have to exercise it nearly as quickly." Collins says the change, which has taken several years to work its way through the system, has tipped the M&A power bal- ance in favour of regulators. And when it comes to M&A, deal cer- tainty is the goal. "Business people don't like surprises," says Collins. It's become critical, then, for business executives con- templating M&A to fi nd the expertise needed to help them prognosticate the Competition Bureau's attitude towards a deal. In most, but not all cases, experi- enced advisors can help them avoid being served with the costly exercise of a SIR by keying them into the fact ahead of time that they may have to divest certain hold- ings or make other alterations to a deal in order for it to pass the Competition Act litmus test. "You have to do a self-assess- ment of the transaction before it gets to the authorities." In order for Sobeys Inc. to get approval of its $5.8-billion purchase of Canada Safeway, the Competition Bureau forced it to sell 23 of Safeway's 223 stores. "What business people want is a fair and frank assess- ment of what they need to do," says Collins. "And then they can manage that. People don't get upset if you say to them, look, you might have to sell some stores, or some gas sta- tions or a plant. ey get that. ey don't necessarily like it. But they can understand it." Adding another layer of uncertainty along with the Com- petition Bureau are the far more nebulous Industry Canada rules such as the "net benefi t" test governing foreign SOEs gaining control of Cana- dian companies, especially those in the oil sands. Under the Investment Canada Act, foreign take-over must be shown to have a net benefi t for Canada in terms of exports, jobs, investment and production. A er approving the acquisition by China's state-owned CNOOC Ltd. of Calgary's Nexen Inc. and Malaysian SOE Petronas's take-over of Progress Energy in the summer of 2012, Stephen Harper stomped the brakes on further majority stakes in Canadian oil sands companies by foreign SOEs, except on an "excep- tional basis." New ICA rules also permit the Indus- try Minister wide latitude in determining what constitutes an SOE. Even compa- nies run by individuals thought to be in- fl uenced by a foreign state can wind up on the SOE list. Politics can, like never before, skewer a deal, and not just at the federal level, says Gordon Chambers, a Vancouver "WHAT BUSINESS PEOPLE WANT IS A FAIR AND FRANK ASSESSMENT OF WHAT THEY NEED TO DO. AND THEN THEY CAN MANAGE THAT. PEOPLE DON'T GET UPSET IF YOU SAY TO THEM, LOOK, YOU MIGHT HAVE TO SELL SOME STORES, OR SOME GAS STATIONS OR A PLANT. THEY GET THAT. THEY DON'T NECESSARILY LIKE IT. BUT THEY CAN UNDERSTAND IT." – Paul Collins, Stikeman Elliott LLP

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Lexpert Special Editions - Corporate Law June 2014