Lexpert Special Editions

Litigation December 2013

The Lexpert Special Editions profiles selected Lexpert-ranked lawyers whose focus is in Corporate, Infrastructure, Energy and Litigation law and relevant practices. It also includes feature articles on legal aspects of Canadian business issues.

Issue link: https://digital.carswellmedia.com/i/216852

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 29 of 39

30 | Securities Enforcement Margoe Edwards/shutterstock.com against self-incrimination, but once an answer is given it's out there and can be shared. In Canada, the notion has typically been you don't have that same right against self-incrimination in the context of an investigation, but there are limits on the sharing between bodies for different purposes. That's absolutely the concern with the Ontario changes." The Ontario amendments have been creating buzz in Alberta, he says. "Ontario is gathering some interest because of the concern about due process and self-incrimination and things like that. And I completely understand their concerns. The absence of a notice provision obviously tends to foreclose an opportunity to make some arguments around self-incrimination." That is not the only amendment Ontario adopted that has securities practitioners predicting more risk and uncertainty on the road ahead. Another amendment causing some concern broadens the definition of insider trading. Traditionally, insiders were banned from trading shares of a company that was "proposing to make a take-over bid." That prohibition has been expanded to situations where an issuer is "considering or evaluating" a take-over bid. Jeffrey Leon, co-head of the litigation group at Bennett Jones LLP in Toronto, says it's an important change. "What this means is an issuer no longer has to have gone so far as to propose a transaction. If you're considering or evaluating a transaction, then that can be caught by the new insider trading provisions. "In terms of widening the net, I think that legislative change makes sense if you're trying to identify those people who trade on non-public information to their advantage." What the expanded insider-trading rules mean for TSX-listed companies and those associated with them is that they will have to be very careful that their blackout policies comply with the new amendment so they don't come up against the tripwire, he says. The challenge is it's not clear at what point the OSC will determine insiders are "considering" a deal. "That's the rub. What does considering mean? It will be a question to determine the point at which that comes into play. LEXPERT®Ranked Lawyers Osborne, Peter J. Lenczner Slaght Royce Smith Griffin LLP (416) 865-3094 posborne@litigate.com One of Canada's leading litigators, Mr. Osborne has a broad civil litigation and administrative law practice encompassing commercial disputes, complex insolvency, class actions and securities matters. Paliare, O.Ont., LSM, Chris G. Paliare Roland Rosenberg Rothstein LLP (416) 646-4318 chris.paliare@ paliareroland.com Mr. Paliare's practice embraces trials, hearings and appeals. His cases engage commercial, administrative, class action, employment and professional discipline matters. He is a Fellow of the IATL, ACTL, ISB and is an Hon. Fellow of COMBAR. Pape, Paul J. Plumpton, Linda M. Poplaw, Mason Potter, Simon V. Pape Barristers Professional Corporation Torys LLP McCarthy Tétrault LLP McCarthy Tétrault LLP (416) 865-8193 lplumpton@torys.com (514) 397-4155 mpoplaw@mccarthy.ca (514) 397-4268 spotter@mccarthy.ca Partner in Torys' Litigation & Dispute Resolution and Competition & Antitrust practice groups. Member of firm's Executive Committee. Focuses on class action defence, corporate/ commercial disputes, professional negligence and securities litigation. Mr. Poplaw focuses on commercial litigation, insolvency, corporate governance and securities. He's experienced in corporate disputes, restructuring, D&O liability and securities class actions. He appears in Québec courts, the SCC and arbitrations. Mr. Potter focuses on commercial and constitutional disputes at trial and appeal, and on trade and competition law. He appears before all levels of court, and has appeared before and served on NAFTA and other arbitration tribunals. (416) 364-8765 pjp@papebarristers.com Mr. Pape focuses on commercial, securities, class action, medical malpractice and administrative matters, with a special emphasis on appeals. He is a Fellow of the IATL and the ACTL. He has acted in a number of cases of significance.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Lexpert Special Editions - Litigation December 2013