Lexpert Magazine

Finance + M&A 2025

Lexpert magazine features articles and columns on developments in legal practice management, deals and lawsuits of interest in Canada, the law and business issues of interest to legal professionals and businesses that purchase legal services.

Issue link: https://digital.carswellmedia.com/i/1534265

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 15 of 123

14 www.lexpert.ca Feature Feature SHIFTING ESG RULES CHALLENGE BUSINESS LEGAL EXPERTS CAUTION FIRMS AGAINST REDUCING SUSTAINABILITY INITIATIVES, URGING FOCUS ON RISK MANAGEMENT, TRANSPARENCY, AND RESILIENCE, REGARDLESS OF INTERNATIONAL POLICY SHIFTS OR POLITICAL CHANGES, WRITES JESSICA MACH SINCE THE US and European Union began scaling back environmental, social, and governance reporting requirements in recent months, ESG experts say the ques- tions they've been getting from Canadian businesses largely boil down to one theme: how should we proceed? "You're seeing a bit of a shi across the globe when it comes to ESG," says Conor Chell, a Calgary-based partner at KPMG Law LLP specializing in ESG law. Chell says this change has le businesses nationwide unsure whether they should pause sustainability efforts, revise them, or abandon them altogether. Sharon Singh, a partner at McMillan LLP and co-head of the firm's Indigenous and environment practices, is hearing similar concerns from clients. With ESG backlash deepening south of the border and potential changes to the federal government at home, many businesses are reviewing their current ESG efforts and asking, "Are we worrying about nothing?" Singh says. She says this question has cropped up regarding various ESG developments, like changes to the Canadian Competition Act, new climate change-related disclosure stan- dards, and human rights due diligence legis- lation. Businesses want to know whether Canadian rules slated to come into effect will be delayed or rolled back. Specific developments beyond Canada's borders are prompting these questions. In February, Mark Uyeda, the US Securities and Exchange Commission's acting chairman, announced the agency would pause defending its climate disclosure rule in court. First proposed in 2022 under the Biden administration, the SEC rule would have required thousands of publicly traded companies to report detailed information about their climate-related risks and impacts. Upon finalizing the rule in 2024, the SEC was immediately hit with multiple lawsuits by trade associations, interest groups, and state attorneys general, who questioned the agency's authority to require such disclo- sures. e cases were consolidated before the Eighth Circuit, a federal appellate court, and the SEC stated that it planned to "vigor- ously" defend the rule. However, that stance shied when the SEC's leadership changed hands with the Trump administration. At the end of March, the SEC told the Eighth Circuit it would no longer defend the rule. e EU is similarly poised to scale back reporting requirements. On February 26, the European Commission unveiled an omnibus package, proposing to simplify numerous corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements introduced under the European Green Deal. Since the European Green Deal's approval in 2020, the EU has adopted a series of regu- lations, such as the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive – which mandated companies to report greenhouse gas emissions and other ESG disclosures – and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive – which imposed additional reporting rules.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Lexpert Magazine - Finance + M&A 2025