La Cible

Mai 2021

La Cible, magazine officiel de l’IQPF, est destinée aux planificateurs financiers et leur permet d’obtenir des unités de formation continue (UFC). Chaque numéro aborde une étude de cas touchant les différents domaines de la planification financière.

Issue link: https://digital.carswellmedia.com/i/1366375

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 31 of 33

32 lacible | Mai 2021 FEATURE ARTICLE So we can see that over the last year, some actively managed mutual funds did well or even outper- formed their benchmark index, but over a period of ten years, the benchmark index has always taken the lead. Another important fact: these are averages, with all the advantages and disadvantages that involves. For an investor in a fund category that beats the index, their return would be higher than the bench - mark even over the long term. Although there are many families of EFTs, as there are for mutual funds, the performance of the vari- ous families is almost identical for passive manage- ment. This is not the case for mutual funds, where the portfolio manager has more power over the selection and choice of securities. The SPIVA scorecard also shows the percentage of funds that over- or underperformed their bench - mark index, as can be seen in Table 2 (see page 33). Just over 10% of Canadian equity funds exceeded the index in 2020. This weighting is relatively stable, even over a period of ten years, since it is around 15%. We can see that nearly 80% of funds in the Cana - dian small and medium cap equity category ex- ceeded the index in 2020 and that this percentage declines to 35% for a ten-year period. As for Canadian dividend and income equity funds, over 55% outperformed the index in 2020, but for the ten-year period, this performance dwindles to just 10%. As the late great Professor Jacques Lussier, CFA, said, the luck factor is often part of the recipe when a portfolio manager posts a noteworthy performance .1 . In conclusion, we can see that in most cases, pas- sive management seems to be more profitable than 1 See online: . Report 3: Equal-Weighted Fund Returns CATEGORY 1 YEAR (%) 3 YEARS (ANNUALIZED, %) 5 YEARS (ANNUALIZED, %) 10 YEARS (ANNUALIZED, %) S&P/TSX Composite 5.60 5.74 9.33 5.76 Canadian Equity 0.81 2.49 6.06 4.49 S&P/TSX Completion 5.97 5.21 8.48 4.47 Canadian Small-/Mid-Cap Equity 14.27 3.89 6.16 3.89 S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats Index -2.34 4.17 7.84 7.14 Canadian Dividend & Income Equity -1.17 2.63 5.93 5.29 S&P 500 (CAD) 16.32 14.81 13.24 16.75 U.S. Equity 13.61 11.07 9.95 12.69 S&P EPAC LargeMidCap (CAD) 8.96 5.98 6.71 8.88 International Equity 7.03 4.46 5.27 7.01 S&P Developed LargeMidCap (CAD) 14.93 11.66 10.90 13.14 Global Equity 10.77 7.57 7.30 8.76 50% S&P/TSX Composite + 25% S&P 500 (CAD) + 25% S&P EPAC LargeMidCap (CAD) 9.30 8.15 9.78 9.36 Canadian Focused Equity 6.52 4.17 6.13 5.01 Source: https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/documents/spiva/spiva-canada-scorecard-year-end-2020.pdf. Table 1

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of La Cible - Mai 2021