Lexpert Magazine

October 2019

Lexpert magazine features articles and columns on developments in legal practice management, deals and lawsuits of interest in Canada, the law and business issues of interest to legal professionals and businesses that purchase legal services.

Issue link: https://digital.carswellmedia.com/i/1181164

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 24 of 31

LEXPERT MAGAZINE | OCTOBER 2019 25 erative System imposes a legal limit on the participating provinces' legislative authority to enact, amend and repeal their respective securities laws as they see fit. Accordingly, primary legislative authority would be maintained and no improper delegation would occur. Constitutionality of the CMSA e Quebec Court of Appeal unanimously held that Parliament had the constitutional authority to enact the CMSA. However, four judges determined that certain sec- tions that dealt with the Council's role and powers in the making of federal regulations were unconstitutional and would, unless removed, render the CMSA as a whole unconstitutional. One dissenting judge dis- agreed with the majority's analysis regard- ing the Council's role and powers. e SCC agreed with the dissenting judge. e SCC applied the principles that it developed in its 2011 decision, Reference re Securities Act, in which it rejected a prior at- tempt to form a national securities regulator, and concluded that the CMSA falls within Parliament's general trade and commerce power. Moreover, the manner in which the CMSA delegates regulation-making respon- sibilities to the Council accords with Parlia- ment's constitutional powers. Political Versus Legal Effects e SCC was careful to distinguish the Memorandum's political and practical ef- fects from its legal effects; pointing out that only the latter were relevant to its analysis. While the Memorandum does not and cannot legally bind the provinces' respec- tive legislatures, its political objective is to achieve uniformity in provincial securities laws across Canada. e SCC observed that "[p]ractically speaking . . . the Council of Ministers may well play an important political role in the area of securities regulation if the Coopera- tive System operates as planned". Further, the Cooperative System will require a "sig- nificant commitment from its participants" including dissolving their existing securities commissions and merging the administra- tion of those commissions into the contem- "A legislature has broad author- ity to delegate subordinate law- making powers to a person or an administrative body. However, a legislature may not delegate its primary authority to legislate in respect of mat- ters that fall with- in its exclusive jurisdiction under the Constitution." plated organizational structure. e SCC observed that, "[o]nce this has been done, it would undoubtedly be impractical for those provinces to extricate themselves from the Cooperative System at a later date". ese practical implications, although irrelevant to the constitutional issues to be determined, are "likely to weigh heavily in the exercise of each jurisdiction's sovereign will — especially given that, at present, no dra of the Authority's enabling legislation has yet been published," the SCC noted. Next Steps In April of 2019, Nova Scotia signed on the Cooperative System, the only jurisdiction to join since the SCC ruled that the Coop- erative System was constitutional. e last published implementation timeline for the Cooperative System was released in July 2016. e Participating Ju- risdictions at that time issued a statement in May 2018 indicating that they would provide an update on the launch of the Cooperative System once the SCC had is- sued its decision on the constitutionality of the Cooperative System. However, no new timeline has been provided. As well, dra legislation establishing the Authority has not yet been released. However, the SCC cautioned that such legislation would "need to be carefully draed so as to respect the limits on over- lapping, yet distinct federal and provin- cial authority." In order for the Cooperative System to operate, the legislature of each Participat- ing Jurisdiction will need to adopt the uni- form CMA. e effect of the results of the recent federal election, which returned a minority parliament, on the prospects and timing for implementation of the Cooperative System are unclear. None of the four national par- ties with members elected to seats in the 43rd Parliament touched on the implemen- tation of the Cooperative System in their election platforms. John Tuzyk, Andrea Laing and Liam Churchill practise at Blake, Cassels & Gray- don LLP SECURITIES FEATURES

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Lexpert Magazine - October 2019