Lexpert Special Editions

Lexpert Special Edition on Litigation 2018

The Lexpert Special Editions profiles selected Lexpert-ranked lawyers whose focus is in Corporate, Infrastructure, Energy and Litigation law and relevant practices. It also includes feature articles on legal aspects of Canadian business issues.

Issue link: https://digital.carswellmedia.com/i/1055648

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 26 of 51

WWW.LEXPERT.CA | 2018 | LEXPERT 27 Kay, Katherine L. Stikeman Elliott LLP (416) 869-5507 kkay@stikeman.com Ms. Kay litigates complex commercial cases, often involving interplay with regulatory, civil and criminal law regimes. Internationally recognized as the leading Canadian competition litigator, her practice includes class actions, product liability, and international cases. A first call for "bet the farm" litigation, she was named one of the Top 25 Women in Litigation by Benchmark Canada. Kauffman, Aubrey E. Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP (416) 868-3538 akauffman@fasken.com Mr. Kauffman's practice is focused on advocacy matters related to domestic and cross-border bankruptcy, insolvency and restructuring proceedings. Past Chair of the Toronto office's Insolvency and Restructuring Group, he is the director of the prestigious Insolvency Institute of Canada and past Chair of the Ontario Bar Association – Insolvency Section. Kapusianyk, QC, Brian G. Gowling WLG (403) 298-1014 brian.kapusianyk@gowlingwlg.com Mr. Kapusianyk practises in the areas of insurance and commercial litigation with an emphasis in professional liability, construction law, D&O litigation, commercial insurance coverage, as well as personal injury and products liability litigation. Kaplan, QC, William C. Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (604) 631-3304 bill.kaplan@blakes.com Mr. Kaplan's litigation practice focuses on corporate/commercial, governance, securities and insolvency matters. He appears on a wide variety of cases at all levels of BC courts, the Supreme Court of Canada, administrative tribunals and arbitration panels. Jolliffe, R. Scott Gowling WLG (416) 862-5400 scott.jolliffe@gowlingwlg.com Mr. Jolliffe is one of Canada's pre-eminent trial and appellate lawyers in the intellectual property field. His areas of specialization include patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret litigation. Jilesen, Monique Lenczner Slaght Royce Smith Griffin LLP (416) 865-2926 mjilesen@litigate.com Ms. Jilesen acts as lead counsel in highly complex proceedings and her extensive litigation practice includes class actions, contract and shareholder disputes, civil fraud cases, injunctions, bankruptcy & insolvency matters, and securities & derivatives cases. She has an enviable record of success at trial in bet-the-company disputes. She is a fellow of the International Academy of Trial Lawyers. LEXPERT-RANKED LAWYERS behave as civilly as they should. Tom Curry, Man- aging Partner at Lenczner Slaght Royce Smith Griffin LLP in Toronto, who represented the LSO in the Groia case (and did not want to com- ment on it specifically), says that might be a con- tributing factor to "the perception that the civility discourse is diminishing. [It's] being replaced by a society that's perhaps too busy. I think as the profession has grown and with the rise of social media and other things, that that contributed to … the disintegration of some of the rules [of con- duct]." Curry himself is the recipient of the 2018 Catzman Award for Professionalism and Civility by e Advocates' Society. Both Curry and Cherniak note that some young lawyers do not have access to the kind of support they had when they were starting out. "I have con- cerns that people coming up in the profession and doing litigation don't have the benefit of the kind of mentoring and experience I had when I was a young counsel," says Cherniak. "ey haven't been exposed to mentoring, either in small firms or as sole practitioners and have no access to advice on how to conduct themselves or how to deal with people who are misconducting themselves." Curry agrees that mentorship provides "oppor- tunities for younger lawyers to observe other law- yers who have achieved the heights of their profes- sion in terms of the quality of their work while also observing the highest standards of civility." While the Groia case dealt with behaviour dur- ing a trial, most litigators' interactions with op- posing counsel, of course, occur outside the court- room and absent the presence of a judge. "It's in phone calls, written correspondence, examination, discovery," says Armstrong, who has experienced uncivil behaviour at times, although she says the majority of her communications have been pro- fessional and courteous. "When counsel conduct themselves [uncivilly in these situations], both parties tend to spend more money on distractions, like scheduling and other unimportant details, rather than on what we have a duty to focus on." Groia's case took a considerable toll on the de- fence lawyer, who estimates he spent $2 million on legal fees and lost business combined as he pursued his defence (the SCC awarded him $500,000, from the LSO, toward his costs). He says he's "con- fident" that a law society "will never again try to prosecute a lawyer for courtroom conduct unless there has been a contempt finding or a judge asks them to do so by way of a complaint referral," a claim the LSO chose not to respond to. It's impossible to know if the SCC's ruling will affect civility within the profession but to Cher- niak, the SCC decision was a "great win for the profession and the public who will need represen- tation by resolute lawyers in the future. ey owe Joe a big debt of gratitude."

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Lexpert Special Editions - Lexpert Special Edition on Litigation 2018