Lexpert Special Editions

Lexpert Special Edition on Litigation 2018

The Lexpert Special Editions profiles selected Lexpert-ranked lawyers whose focus is in Corporate, Infrastructure, Energy and Litigation law and relevant practices. It also includes feature articles on legal aspects of Canadian business issues.

Issue link: https://digital.carswellmedia.com/i/1055648

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 7 of 51

8 LEXPERT | 2018 | WWW.LEXPERT.CA Bombier, Nina Lenczner Slaght Royce Smith Griffin LLP (416) 865-3052 nbombier@litigate.com Ms. Bombier is an astute litigator. Her broad practice encompasses commercial litigation, professional negligence and regulatory matters, insurance and public law. She has extensive trial experience in complex commercial and regulatory cases, and medical malpractice actions. She has appeared as counsel before all levels of court in Ontario, the Federal Court and the Supreme Court of Canada. Boggs, C. Kirk Lerners LLP (416) 601-2367 kboggs@lerners.ca Mr. Boggs focuses on insurance defence, appellate advocacy, class actions and health law. His insurance law practice involves extensive public entity and police defence, professional negligence-legal, motor vehicle, property damage, fraud, E&O, D&O and commercial liability claims. He also provides coverage assistance in these areas. He is the 2018 recipient of the OBA Award for Excellence in Insurance Law. Boddez, Thomas M. Thorsteinssons LLP (604) 602-4260 tmboddez@thor.ca Mr. Boddez has been practising for over 25 years, has served as Managing Partner of Thorsteinssons LLP and as a Governor of the Canadian Tax Foundation. He has represented taxpayers at all levels of court, including Superior Courts, Tax Court, Federal Court, Federal Court of Appeal and Supreme Court of Canada. He is regularly recognized as one of Canada's leaders in the field of tax controversies. Bjorkquist, Sonia L. Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP (416) 862-5876 sbjorkquist@osler.com Ms. Bjorkquist is Chair of Osler's National Litigation group and Immediate Past President of The Advocates' Society. She defends companies in class actions, commercial arbitration and other complex litigation, including disputes involving product liability, director/officer liability and business- critical issues relating to commercial agreements. Bishop, David C. Gowling WLG (403) 298-1941 david.bishop@gowlingwlg.com Mr. Bishop practises corporate/commercial litigation with an emphasis on directors' and officers' defence, product liability, professional liability disputes, shareholder disputes, class actions, large property claims and environmental litigation. He has appeared in the Courts at all levels, including the Alberta and Manitoba Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Canada. Binnie, CC, QC, Ian Lenczner Slaght Royce Smith Griffin LLP (416) 865-3737 ibinnie@litigate.com The Honourable Mr. Binnie served for nearly 14 years as a Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada. He draws on his judicial insights and courtroom experience acquired over 30 years as one of Canada's top litigators. He is regularly consulted by governments and private parties on a range of private and public law issues, and carries on an active practice as a domestic and international arbitrator. LEXPERT-RANKED LAWYERS e end result, he says, is arbitration is now struggling with many of the same is- sues around delays and costs as the courts. Horton is hardly a voice in the wilder- ness. Nina Bombier, a Partner at Lenc- zner Slaght Royce Smith Griffin LLP in Toronto, agrees that arbitration has its share of problems, but she mostly blames human nature. "If parties are antagonis- tic and can't agree on anything, going into arbitration probably won't solve many problems," she argues. In other words, if disputants are determined to drag each other into the mud, there's nothing to stop them, whether they're facing an arbitrator or a judge. One of the simplest ways to ensure arbitration doesn't become a quagmire is for parties to agree to work together. Once they've decided to launch the process, they must focus on the common goal of moving forward and not on the disagreement. Simply put, they must want to reach a solution, says Bombier. If they are willing to co-operate and work together to come up with a mutually agreed- upon process, then not only can they save time and money, they might also end up with a result that both are happy with, she says. Much the same argument could be made for the court system. If both parties go in with the hope of getting a quick result at reasonable cost, that can be an achievable goal. Dominique Hussey, a Part- ner at Bennett Jones LLP in Toronto, specializes And it wasn't just disputants. Legal professionals took the cue as well. Like the disputants, not all took the time to properly understand how arbitration works and how it could be made to bene- fit clients, says William Horton, a Toron- to-based arbitrator and sole practitioner. "We have a lot of litigators and, frankly, retired judges who move from litigation to arbitration but don't do anything dif- ferently," says Horton. "ey don't try to find out how arbitration can be conduct- ed. ey are not curious about processes that parties might accept as fair, because their idea of fairness is so informed by court rules that they cannot imagine any- thing other than that being fair." "IF PARTIES ARE ANTAGONISTIC AND CAN'T AGREE ON ANYTHING, GOING INTO ARBITRATION PROBABLY WON'T SOLVE MANY PROBLEMS." NINA BOMBIER; LENCZNER SLAGHT ROYCE SMITH GRIFFIN LLP

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Lexpert Special Editions - Lexpert Special Edition on Litigation 2018