Lexpert Special Editions

Lexpert Special Edition on Litigation 2018

The Lexpert Special Editions profiles selected Lexpert-ranked lawyers whose focus is in Corporate, Infrastructure, Energy and Litigation law and relevant practices. It also includes feature articles on legal aspects of Canadian business issues.

Issue link: https://digital.carswellmedia.com/i/1055648

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 36 of 51

WWW.LEXPERT.CA | 2018 | LEXPERT 37 Ouellet, Patrick Woods LLP (514) 982-2551 pouellet@woods.qc.ca Partner of the firm, Mr. Ouellet is known as one of Québec's finest trial and appellate lawyers, with nearly 20 years of experience dealing with high-end commercial and corporate litigation matters. His focus has been in litigation and arbitration involving securities, telecommunications, class actions, construction, and shareholder disputes. He is responsible for many especially high-profile cases. Osborne, Peter Lenczner Slaght Royce Smith Griffin LLP (416) 865-3094 posborne@litigate.com Recognized as one of Canada's leading litigators, Mr. Osborne has a broad civil litigation and administrative law practice encompassing cross-border commercial disputes, complex cross-border restructuring and insolvency cases, class actions and securities matters, as well as professional malpractice litigation and disciplinary proceedings. Orzy, S. Richard Bennett Jones LLP (416) 777-5737 orzyr@bennettjones.com Mr. Orzy is one of the most well-known restructuring and insolvency lawyers in Canada. He covers all major areas of restructuring, mostly on cross- border matters, having led many involving the US, Europe, South and Central America and Israel. He is known for his preeminent Canadian practice representing bondholders, major foreign creditors and landlords in many of Canada's largest restructurings. O'Sullivan, LSM, Terrence J. Lax O'Sullivan Lisus Gottlieb LLP (416) 598-3556 tosullivan@counsel-toronto.com Mr. O'Sullivan's litigation and arbitration practices focus on business disputes, financial institution litigation, regulatory charges and defence of directors' and officers' liability. He acts as a mediator, arbitrator and is an ACTL and IATL Fellow. He routinely appears in all levels of court, including the Supreme Court of Canada. O'Connor, David F. Roy O'Connor LLP (416) 350-2474 dfo@royoconnor.ca Mr. O'Connor is a founding partner of Roy O'Connor LLP. He is recognized by Benchmark as a star in class actions and commercial litigation. He was a finalist for Canadian Class Action Litigator of the Year in 2015 and 2017, and for the Top 25 Most Influential Lawyers in Canada in 2015 and 2016 (Canadian Lawyer magazine). He is also ranked by Lexpert® and Chambers in the area of Class Actions. Nicholl, AdE, John I.S. Clyde & Co Canada LLP (855) 607-4288 john.nicholl@clydeco.ca A bilingual insurance litigator who commutes between Ontario and Québec, Mr. Nicholl's trial, appellate and arbitration practice focuses on insurance and reinsurance coverage disputes, D&O, professional and product liability, and class action defence. LEXPERT-RANKED LAWYERS At the heart of the cases is "the bid-ask spread manipulation, and the benchmark fixings," says Sterns. "e bid-ask spread … allegation is that these banks would communicate with each other, and say, 'I've got a customer, I'm going to quote, what's everyone think?' In the FX world, we know that from pleas that have been agreed to by some the defendants," including in the United States. "is was pervasive," he adds. "You had trad- ers in a very small market, sharing information, disclosing confidential claims, agreeing on how wide the spread would be, and agreeing that a particular client of one bank would be quoted a certain amount, and other [banks] wouldn't compete with that. … On a basic level, it's no different than two sellers getting together and deciding to raise prices." Approximately twelve defendants have so far agreed to settle in the FX case, with about $110 million in settlements agreed to. In July, class counsel received approval of their plan of alloca- tion and are about ready to start the claims pro- cess, Bach says. "In a conspiracy class action, when you're suing a lot of people engaged in a conspiracy, typically the institution that settles first is giving some money [in settlement to plaintiffs], but primarily it is giving information about the conspiracy," Bach adds. What typically happens is that at one point, one party decides they want out of the conspiracy and comes to a law firm to provide information, he says. "at's oen called an icebreaker settlement." is helps a case develop in terms of what is understood of the underlying conduct, he adds. According to the filed statements of claim, this has included traders in "chat rooms" discussing bench- mark manipulation with each other. In the FX case, the non-settling defendants will have until early December to file their re- sponding material in certification motions, says Baert, and the hearing will take place next June in front of Justice Paul Perell of Ontario's Su- perior Court of Justice. "On the presumption they won't admit they're part of a conspiracy, it will all come down to whether they were part of the price-fixing groups," based on evidence, for example, provided by Bloomberg terminals that traders were allegedly using to fix pricing, he says. e US case in the alleged forex/FX bench- mark manipulation has settled largely with "the same body of defendants that we have settled with," says Bach. In the gold and silver bench- mark cases, settlement has been reached in the US but not in Canada, nor have certification dates been scheduled. "I would not be surprised to know that some- thing was also happening in the UK and Aus- tralia," Bach adds. "It's a global alleged conspiracy

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Lexpert Special Editions - Lexpert Special Edition on Litigation 2018